ralphiewvu
Well-Known Member
They beat Rutgers though.
Touché
They beat Rutgers though.
Damn it. I like me some KD but he’s trying too hard here in his new digs.just so you know he's Kingdoosh from SO.
a. Clemson got lucky
b. the SEC isn't THAT good
c. the world is against Alabama
d. Saban's players went on strike
I've observed and these are the most common:a. Clemson got lucky
b. the SEC isn't THAT good
c. the world is against Alabama
d. Saban's players went on strike
What an idiot. He is trying to say the Bama reciever should be blocking while the ball is in the air. Dumbass doesn't realize the Saban staple pick play is illegal. He has seen it so many times he thinks it legal.
What an idiot. He is trying to say the Bama reciever should be blocking while the ball is in the air. Dumbass doesn't realize the Saban staple pick play is illegal. He has seen it so many times he thinks it legal.
Probably doesn't think holding is a penalty if he watches that much Bama football.
Mainly, Clemson is just THAT GOOD. As good as Alabama was (and they were), Clemson was just better. When two teams are this close, there are always other factors that make a difference in the outcome of a game, but non-critical thinkers take that as making excuses instead of looking inward to figure out what went wrong this time to avoid it happening next time. The bottom line is that the BEST TEAM won the game and deserves all of the praise and the glory. Hold that Tiger!
I agree, but must ask this. What do you do with a tiger while holding it?
What an idiot. He is trying to say the Bama reciever should be blocking while the ball is in the air. Dumbass doesn't realize the Saban staple pick play is illegal. He has seen it so many times he thinks it legal.
Probably doesn't think holding is a penalty if he watches that much Bama football.
It's a pass. When the pass is in the air recievers can't block or it's a penalty. If they had blocked the DB before the pass was caught (since he intercepted that is the only way it could have happened) it would have been offensive pass interference.Huh? It's pretty obvious that's what he was supposed to do. You can see he tried to block the guy, but didn't. He is pointing out that the reason he isn't/can't block him is because the guy is already cheating in due to knowing where the ball was going to go. If the guy is where he is supposed to be, aka not to the inside there, then you can easily block him because it would be the defender pressing on him, and then the receiver is able to run around the edge on the block because he is already running that way full speed.
Good defensive play. Well prepped, etc.
It's a pass. When the pass is in the air recievers can't block or it's a penalty. If they had blocked the DB before the pass was caught (since he intercepted that is the only way it could have happened) it would have been offensive pass interference.
Seriousily you guys are so used to Bama's pick plays that you think that shit is legal.