figures you cant get the idea or better yet dont want towe are not talking about KC here. we are talking about the Pats game.
figures you cant get the idea or better yet dont want towe are not talking about KC here. we are talking about the Pats game.
Gainesville probably looked a lot like Fredericksburg when I grew up there 30 years ago. Now, its insane as are most places considered rural to DC.
I go to Fredericksburg a fair amount but I do in the back way from 301 since I live in St. Mary's County. Love the Rapp and old Fredericksburg. I try to stay out the part west of 95 .... unless I go up River Road to fish the Rapp.
why did he have to check out of the play? the oline let him down. cmon MR. Monday Morning QB. No one is blaming this game on Brady in New England. No you haven't you keep putting up his stats.
Did Brady get traded to the Redskins or Eagles?
Actually, it was some guy that posted on the NE/RI board. He said that Dean was right therefore Dean proved it as fact.Yeah. Can we trade Dean for him? Dean is worth it in his own mind because Kiper said so.
Actually, it was some guy that posted on the NE/RI board. He said that Dean was right therefore Dean proved it as fact.
Its not hard to be always right when you are constantly changing your argument.Maybe we should all just realize...Dean is always right
In his own mind.
Let me get this straight. You are now saying it was the OL's fault that NE lost? First it was the D. Then it was shared by the coaches. Now it is the OL? Keep on moving the goal posts "TV Slayer."
People put up statistics to back up statements. Completion percentage matters when the WRs didn't drop passes and Dad is telling you he missed three TD passes. It is called backing up you argument.
You wouldn't know about backing up an argument though. Your idea of backing up an argument is lalalalalalalalalalalalala, I said so. Or, lalalaalalalallaa, Kiper said so. Or, lalalaalaalalaala KC broke my TV.
No. The original argument is even the best have bad games and that you judge KC by a different standard that you do Tom Brady. Then you spent 20+ posts proving it.no. on that particular play it was the oline. you don't get it. move on. The original argument was that Brady was blamed for this loss. I proved countless times that it wasn't.
no. on that particular play it was the oline. you don't get it. move on. The original argument was that Brady was blamed for this loss. I proved countless times that it wasn't.
Show me one post where it says Brady is the sole reason NE lost the game.
Originally, you blamed the coaching staff for that one play because they took it out of Brady's hands.
No. The original argument is even the best have bad games and that you judge KC by a different standard that you do Tom Brady. Then you spent 20+ posts proving it.
wrong. I never said Brady had a bad game. you guys did. I proved that he didn't. you are blowing this way put of proportion and don't even know what the original argument is.
I responded to you b/c you thought Brady had a bad game and was a reason for there loss. that is all.
Hold the fuck on. How did you prove he didn't have a bad game?