Notabout Lynch. if an adult cannot conduct himself in a proper manner he does not deserve to have anything good saidabout him.
What did he do that upsets you so much?
Notabout Lynch. if an adult cannot conduct himself in a proper manner he does not deserve to have anything good saidabout him.
Ya, I really don't give a shit what Donald Sterling, or anyone for that matter, thinks, just what they do. Its their actions that count in my book.
As much as I hate the pussification of this country, USF needs to maintain as much recruiting power as possible. It's competitive dis/advantage. If they lose ONE recruit because he didn't like that a coach talked bad about a player (in a public manner, no less) then that coach deserves the suspension.
What did he do that upsets you so much?
The disrespect to teams in interviews, the lack of effort in the workouts at the combine at at the Pro day for the school. The general disrespect for the process and for authority. He seems like the typical "angry black man".
Well, you DO realize that he has been sued for racial discrimination with his properties that is pretty public knowledge and the plaintiffs WON, right?
I call paying out over 3.5 million dollars in a lawsuit LOSING. If it were in fact a garbage claim, he could have easily fought those claims in court. No businessman, specifically a slum lord, would bat an eye at forcing this to court.
Link?
You are probably correct on this one. I haven't followed it very closely. Actions like those, if true, are awful. Saying something derogatory about a guy in a private conversation with your girl friend you are a jealous old man is not so bad. Bitches make guys say and do crazy things all the time.
Did you see the Anderson Cooper interview?!? He continues to put his foot in his mouth repeatedly. Don't blame bitches, blame racist old men who don't know when to shut up, regardless of who is talking to them.
As much as I hate the pussification of this country, USF needs to maintain as much recruiting power as possible. It's competitive dis/advantage. If they lose ONE recruit because he didn't like that a coach talked bad about a player (in a public manner, no less) then that coach deserves the suspension.
I'm not sure that comment by the strength & conditioning coach would've dissuaded a single recruit from going to UCF. Maybe I'm wrong. I just don't see how the comment would make anyone want to not go there. What's the thinking behind that?
"The dumbasses on the team will be thrown under the bus by the coaches. If I'm a dumbass, the coaches are going to trash me."
Would that really dissuade a recruit from going there? I mean you at least have to be a little bit tough to play FB at a college level don't you?
Two sides of the story... right or wrong does not matter, but one way or the other it will have an effect... All it would take is one recruit to find fault with USF's strength and conditioning coach to create negative hype for the Bulls... I've been following recruiting for years now, and can honestly say it doesn't take much to turn off a recruit and have them never look back at a once promising university destination...
I'm not sure that comment by the strength & conditioning coach would've dissuaded a single recruit from going to UCF. Maybe I'm wrong. I just don't see how the comment would make anyone want to not go there. What's the thinking behind that?
"The dumbasses on the team will be thrown under the bus by the coaches. If I'm a dumbass, the coaches are going to trash me."
Would that really dissuade a recruit from going there? I mean you at least have to be a little bit tough to play FB at a college level don't you?
What do you think the chances are that a comment like that would actually cast UCF in a positive light in the eyes of a potential recruit? I don't know how HSFB players think, but I actually gave the guy a lot of respect for what he said.
What do you think the chances are that a comment like that would actually cast UCF in a positive light in the eyes of a potential recruit? I don't know how HSFB players think, but I actually gave the guy a lot of respect for what he said.
You give a guy credit for going on twitter to rip a former player? Why wasn't he talking prior to the draft?
There are some farily important differences between the sign at LSU and what this coach did.
1. Presumably, Les Miles is aware of the sign at LSU and has approved it. This tweet was sent out, presumably, without the approval of the head coach. Football teams are not democracies. If you break from the approved message you should expect some degree of discipline.
2. The LSU sign was "in house" and was released to the public through a third party (presumably someone associated with an NFL team). You can argue that it was posted in 2012/13 and its "release" to the public was inevitable, but ultimately it was not a coach, who is subordinate to Miles, who released the information. In the USF/Lynch case the coach shared his opinion with the general public directly directly. Speaking of his opinion. . .
3. Presumably the players listed on the sign at LSU were missing workouts. That would then be a fact. There is opinion (lack character and motivation etc), but the sign is grounded in what is presumably an indisputable fact. The USF tweet is 100% opinion. He didn't bring any facts to the discussion.
4. The LSU sign is posted informing scouts the S&C coach will not answer questions regarding those players. Presumably the questions that the S&C coach are asked are related to workout numbers, dedication to working out and character. He has answered some of those questions(opinion-based ones) in his sign, and made it clear he won't discuss the statistical/fact questions. The USF coach is simply public bashing a player AFTER the draft. He may have shared his opinion with the Niners, and any other team, during the scouting process. He clearly has some grudge with Lynch though, that he has chosen to express pubically.
5. I don't remember any LSU coaches bashing Sam Montgomery last year.
6. Your comment "This is why LSU is LSU and USF is USF" is slightly off. It's not WHY. It's BECAUSE. This is BECAUSE LSU is LSU and USF is USF.
LSU can afford to put up signs like that because LSU's best recruiter is its history. USF doesn't have a history. They can't bring potential recruits to the facilities and show off National Championships. They can't walk down a hall with name after name of NFL players. There are currently 17 former USF Bulls in the NFL. The most (only?) notable is Jason-Pierre Paul. There are 53 LSU Tigers. I'm not even going to try to pick the most notable. USF has put a total of 56 players in the NFL in its history. The vast majority as undrafted FAs who may never have made a game day roster (this doesn't include this year's draft picks and udfa class).
LSU has nearly as many players in the NFL right now as USF has put in the NFL in the school's history.
USF has had a total of 2 first round picks in its history. LSU has had 38 (+4 in the AFL).
LSU will pretty much always land 4 and 5 star recruits. They will compete for the top talent in Louisiana, Alabama, Florida and Texas. USF at this point will fight with UCF, and possibly FAU for guys that don't sign with SEC schools first, and then don't get interest from the Big 10, Big 12, ACC and Pac 12.