Bamabino
No Limit Holdem Refugee
USC is irrelevant. Zero NC's since 1978.
angry poster confirms he is angry
HELL NO!!!
Roll Tide
Please no body quote me on this post, or I swear I will show up at your place of employment with BamaBear's t Baggin britches on.
Texas is irrelevant. 1 NC since 1970.
Ironically, you seem to think that is a relevant fact.
Alabama's losses since 2008
2008- SEC&BCS Champion Florida(13-1), MWC&Sugar Champion Utah(13-0)
2009-Zilch
2010- SEC&BCS Champion Auburn(14-0), Cotton Champion LSU(11-2), SECEast Champion S.Carolina(9-5)
2011- SEC Champ & BCS Runner up LSU(13-1)
2012- Cotton Champion Texas A&M(11-2)
2013- SEC Champ & BCS Runner up Auburn(12-2), Sugar Champion Oklahoma(11-2)
Hmmm... I don't see any Washington State, Washington, NC State, Boston College, Syracuse, Purdue, Iowa, Arizona, Arizona State, Iowa State, Texas Tech, Oregon State, Pittsburgh, or any other mediocre teams on that list.
It doesn't matter who we play, we will always be favored. Any loss is a disappointment. But we know we don't lose to teams that we aren't supposed to. That's what has separated Saban from the rest. If we lose, it's gonna be to a damn good football team.
Alabama played a top5 team in an away game last year. USC played Stanford at home as your best game of the year.
Turns out there is a reason you want to only look at the OOC schedule. And really, counting Notre Dame who you play every year as OOC and thus somehow more important simply because they don't carry the same conference label is pretty lame.
USC idiot logic: Playing 9-4 Notre Dame on the road > Playing the team that went to the National Championship game on the road.
Well, holy shit. This is going to be absolutely unbelievable. If USC's back by 2016 after getting raped by the NCAA, this one could go down as the most highly anticipated regular season match-up in college football history. Props to USC. Man, do they have a set of balls on them. They'll play anyone, anywhere.
That is a damn interesting read. Just trying to figure out why all of that is relevant to the criticism that Bama does not schedule OOC games on the road.
That is a damn interesting read. Just trying to figure out why all of that is relevant to the criticism that Bama does not schedule OOC games on the road.
Schools play the conference games they are scheduled to play . School makes their OCC schedules and play who they want. Most teams play OCC road games against decent teams once in a while . Bama plays one legged blind trucking schools only at home. Own it gump.
It is.
Well, holy shit. This is going to be absolutely unbelievable. If USC's back by 2016 after getting raped by the NCAA, this one could go down as the most highly anticipated regular season match-up in college football history. Props to USC. Man, do they have a set of balls on them. They'll play anyone, anywhere.
-Let me know when where Alabama plays their OOC matters. Because last I looked, Alabama has more National Championships in the past 5 years than Texas does in the past 44.
Thus proving Texas is relevant to you, because if Texas was irrelevant than that stat would not need to be written.
-I'm sure Longhorn futility on the field of play is common knowledge among their fans. 1 NC in 40+ years is pathetic.