Flyingiguana
New Member
As I said you don't understand math - let it go, brother.
i've forgotten more about math than u will ever know
As I said you don't understand math - let it go, brother.
i've forgotten more about math than u will ever know
Classic. "I don't care how his actual performance has been, I know what I see!"
Doesn't it just come down to the Cutler vs. Smith thing? You love a QB that throws hard and at least *tries* to make big plays, nevermind if he's actually good at it. You'll take an interception machine because at least he "doesn't leave yards on the field". Always downplay Smith's strengths, exaggerate his weaknesses (tied for 9th in Yards Per Attempt destroys your whole stupid point), and act like he's the only thing holding this team back.
When Hostler was calling his high school caliber offense Smith was the problem. When Sing and Raye were running their 50s offense Smith was the problem. And now we've got a smart offense, and Smith is playing decent, and we're 5-2, and imagine that, he's still such a huge problem. You guys will always zero in on him, no matter what, no matter how he plays, no matter what the stats say, and no matter how many times he proves you wrong just keep at it. From the outside looking in its so obvious how bent your perspective is.
You spent the last 8 years shoved so far up Alex's asshole you have no idea what a good QB even looks like anymore. Get a hold of yourself.
There's no sense in trying to convince anyone. He doesn't think he's competent. You and I think he is. None of us will change our mind until he makes us, for good or bad. I don't think either of us are saying he's great or the franchise and if we win it won't be because of him unless he changes his play, which none of us are predicting. Let's move on?
yep, you're trying to say he is competent, not 'great'. but those arguing against Alex are taking your 'competent' as 'great'.
Alex led the 49ers to the NFC Championship game, and has won so many games of late. but all he needed was one bad game (Giants game) to set 'hate' in motion, not surprising really. cause expectations have sky rocketed this season. fans are expecting great and as such, more dissapointed.
since this team is now, i'm only looking at now, Alex Smith is still our best chance to win the NEXT game. we can't just wish we had a 'great' QB (now), nor just wish Alex becomes one, just 'enjoy' the good TEAM we have.
yep, you're trying to say he is competent, not 'great'. but those arguing against Alex are taking your 'competent' as 'great'.
Alex led the 49ers to the NFC Championship game, and has won so many games of late. but all he needed was one bad game (Giants game) to set 'hate' in motion, not surprising really. cause expectations have sky rocketed this season. fans are expecting great and as such, more dissapointed.
since this team is now, i'm only looking at now, Alex Smith is still our best chance to win the NEXT game. we can't just wish we had a 'great' QB (now), nor just wish Alex becomes one, just 'enjoy' the good TEAM we have.
so here i am talking about 10 yards+ and you start using stats for 20 yards.
maybe u should get your head out of your ass before you start to argue....
well this is where my problem comes. arizona is gonna have time, unlike seattle, to gameplan around the possibility that smith has an issue with that finger.
just like how teams adjusted to doug flutie and learned to take away those shorter passes. and smith doesn't have flutie's ability to improvise.
Uh huh. You know what the difference between us is? I can recognize and acknowledge when Smith plays badly. You either can't recognize, or admit, when he plays well.
I have no idea what a good QB looks like, says Cutler's #1 fan. Thanks for the lesson.
Yeah, we have different definitions and not only that but we either assume that others are using the same definition or we assume the worst with theirs. I understand that he wasn't talking about regular season, because I assume most will give that (competent). But in the playoffs, he has a mixed record. Yes, NYG is better than NO and the NFCC is bigger, but if he were not competent, we would have lost to the high scoring Saints team. There are other ways of saying Smith isn't a Super Bowl QB than saying he's not competent, IMO.
yep, you're trying to say he is competent, not 'great'. but those arguing against Alex are taking your 'competent' as 'great'.
Alex led the 49ers to the NFC Championship game, and has won so many games of late. but all he needed was one bad game (Giants game) to set 'hate' in motion, not surprising really. cause expectations have sky rocketed this season. fans are expecting great and as such, more dissapointed.
since this team is now, i'm only looking at now, Alex Smith is still our best chance to win the NEXT game. we can't just wish we had a 'great' QB (now), nor just wish Alex becomes one, just 'enjoy' the good TEAM we have.
Seriously?!?.
I'm not sure how the: "over 20 yards" is a subset of the "10 yards+ superset", fact escaped a mathematical Mensa such as yourself but clearly it did - I know, crazy, right!?!
I'm using the same statistic as you and in strict accordance to your argument that Smith threw 50% fewer passes over 10+ yards because his throwing hand was amputated.
In response to your claim that: "[Smith was] checking down TWICE as much and [was] unwilling to throw down the field" I stated in post 177 that I was using ESPN stats to demonstrate you were wrong.
These are the facts. Smith threw 76% of his passes 10yds and less prior to having his arm amputated and 79% after.
Now, does the difference between 79% & 76% equal 50% to you? Of course it does.
Since the above numbers are for 10yds and less can you figure the difference for passes over 10 yards? Of course you can't - here, let me help you.
The following would be the difference. Prior to having his torso amputated 24% of Smith's passes were over 10yds and 21% after.
Now, does the difference between 24% & 21% equal 50% to you? Of course it does.
Since the premise of your argument was Smith's lack of velocity manifested itself by Smith throwing twice as many passes 10 yards or less then it's reasonable to expect your claim would be statistically supported.
Guess what genius, it wasn't. In fact there are not any combinations of ESPN subsets that support your argument - not one!
These are the facts Fi. Sorry, but after this, the only conclusion any reasonable person can make about you is that you're an idiot, and I think that is a fair and non-derogatory conclusion.
u don't have the same numbers i have....
MNF Preview: Cards' uphill battle vs. 49ers - NFC West Blog - ESPN
According to Sando's article above and the 6.6 to 5.5 attempts per game numbers from Bem, it looks like Smith is completing (not attempting) half the number of 10+ yard passes per game - 4 per game in the first five games and 2 per game in the last two. Obviously, math wise that means Alex has a worse completion percentage in the last two, not a significant dip in attempts. This is mainly due to the defense and Alex, so don't get me wrong, but this is the closest I can get to 50% that FI's claiming. I tried.
(The math: 6.6 attempts/game * 59.5% = 3.927 ~ 4/game. 5.5 attempts/game * 38.5% = 2.1175 ~ 2/game. 2.1175/3.927 = 53.9 ~ 50%)
This is really stupid - can you figure out why?