Johnnydollaz89
Well-Known Member
Steelers, wow
If the Bills pick at 3, they would have to take him. I would think?...but then again, they are the Bills after all.
Oh my, Pittsburgh almost pulled off a miracle lateral play to win the game. Dude barely stepped out at the 13 yard line, if not for that it was a TD.
Just to be blunt then...give me a list of all the mobile type QB's who have won a Super Bowl.
And while I may get some heat for saying this, I don't consider Wilson a top QB. I strongly believe he's successful because of the team around him, not the other way around. I have seen a few games where he looked less than stellar, but the rest of the team covered up his weak play. He succeeds because the rest of the team is that good.
Again, that's just MY opinion on that.
He did have a rough start to the season, but he's looked great since then. His mechanics are excellent.
Steve Young could be classified as a bit of a scrambler, if I remember correctly. And Rodgers is mobile. I think Staubach was, too.
Those guys were more known for their arms/IQs than their scrambling. They were mobile when needed, but very good in the pocket.
I think RGIII can get there, though, and I think Russell Wilson pretty much is there. They're just more capable scramblers on top of it.
He did have a rough start to the season, but he's looked great since then. His mechanics are excellent.
Steve Young could be classified as a bit of a scrambler, if I remember correctly. And Rodgers is mobile. I think Staubach was, too.
Steve Young could be classified as a bit of a scrambler, if I remember correctly. And Rodgers is mobile. I think Staubach was, too.
Both have rocket arms, but they're so used to relying on their feet, they have happy feet in the pocket. They have to learn to be a bit more comfortable in there, and when it comes to it, run. Both have GOOD arms, no doubt.
Going back a ways but Fran Tarkenton was a good scrambler too.
LOL New England has the lead.