FSUmanager
FeartheSpear
Which part arent you buying? The DNA says there was sexual contact, she reported the crime relatively quickly and went almost immediately for an evaluation. She hasnt tried to get media coverage for herself, she hasnt wrote a book or seemingly to this point have any motivation for accusing him. Let's also remember when she identified him as the perp he was relatively unknown.
She supposedly knew him before the incident. Why name him as unknown the night of the incident? She stated that she and everyone else had been drinking that night. Her toxicology showed that she had not been drinking. Why the inconsistencies? Then there is the little known fact that Winston's GF was flying in that day. Maybe he told her to bounce and she got pissed? Who knows. Too many assumptions being made as to whether he is guilty or not. Let the SA who I despise do his job either way.