Tournament Thread tOfficial 2019 ncaa tournament thread

[Hitman Hart]

time for UNC to kick Iona's ass and prove once and for all that sweet tea is far superior to unsweetened tea

 

[gob]

Well... If you told me we'd go into the second half up 2, only 2 fouls on Kaleb, I'd be happy.

Definitely could have done better, but we're not in a bad position

 

[gob]

Welp this is what you get more than half the time. Not even playmakers

Yeah.... Next season is definitely going to be better.

 

[Myles]

That Liberty/Miss State game was the best and most entertaining game of the tourney so far.

 

[The Derski]

Just got off the phone with my dad.....he's going to Mexico on the spur of the moment.....






#Spendingmoneyneedlessly

 

[gob]

BTW, currently on a moderate beer at half, so we'll see... Might have a few minutes of second half ball to determine selection

 

[The Derski]

Every year, around March, I have the sudden urge to punch Seth Davis in the face. I don’t know why.

 

[Yo Tee]

You can't expect to be taken seriously if you are trying to put the shitty pac above the sec. Also 5-2 is better than 2-1. I'm not sure if you were trying to say the pac had a better win percentage or were referring to somebody else. The big 12 is down this year as well. Texas Tech is tough but about even with LSU. Nobody in that conference is as good as Kentucky or Tennessee.

We are judging based on the tournament are we not? So how can the Pac-12 NOT be put ahead of the SEC right now? While I agree that noone in the Pac-12 is as good as Kentucky, I'm not so sure about Tennessee after their game against Colgate. Right now, the B1G (6-1), Big 12 (4-1) and Pac 12 (3-1) all have a better winning percentage than the SEC (5-2).

 

[Yo Tee]

Looks like UNC finally woke up. Seems like all these ACC 1 seeds just forgot to play the first half.

 

[gob]

UCF bounced back, apparently.


Also, HAHAHA Cincinnati. Fuck you. I just noticed this score. HAHAHA

 

[SU Nittany Tide]

We are judging based on the tournament are we not? So how can the Pac-12 NOT be put ahead of the SEC right now? While I agree that noone in the Pac-12 is as good as Kentucky, I'm not so sure about Tennessee after their game against Colgate. Right now, the B1G (6-1), Big 12 (4-1) and Pac 12 (3-1) all have a better winning percentage than the SEC (5-2).

SEC has five teams in the second round. PAC has two. SEC has a higher win percentage than the PAC. I'm not sure what kind of voodoo magic you could do to convince anyone that means the PAC has been better.

I see now you are counting the play in game. I guess if only the SEC had a team low enough they could have won another game. Regardless, you aren't convincing anybody the PAC is better.

 

[The Derski]

SEC has five teams in the second round. PAC has two. SEC has a higher win percentage than the PAC. I'm not sure what kind of voodoo magic you could do to convince anyone that means the PAC has been better.

I see now you are counting the play in game. I guess if only the SEC had a team low enough they could have won another game. Regardless, you aren't convincing anybody the PAC is better.

For some reason I thought you were a Penn State fan this entire time. I never even noticed the UK logo.

 

[SU Nittany Tide]

For some reason I thought you were a Penn State fan this entire time. I never even noticed the UK logo.

Nah. I liked temple when I was a little kid...

 

[Deep Creek]

Conferences aren't playing each other. Teams are.

 

[SU Nittany Tide]

Conferences aren't playing each other. Teams are.

Not at the moment...

 

[gob]

Start of the second half, boys. Let's rip it

 

[Yo Tee]

SEC has five teams in the second round. PAC has two. SEC has a higher win percentage than the PAC. I'm not sure what kind of voodoo magic you could do to convince anyone that means the PAC has been better.

I see now you are counting the play in game. I guess if only the SEC had a team low enough they could have won another game.

SEC doesn't have a higher win percentage than the Pac-12 due to the play in game. The play-in game is part of the tournament so why would we not count it? The Pac-12 is 3-1 in the NCAA tournament which is a % of .750 while the SEC is 5-2 which is a % of .714. You can't pick and choose which games you count. I'm not trying to convince anyone that the Pac-12 is better than the SEC. I'm saying that the Pac-12 has LOOKED better and has a better winning percentage in the tournament so far.

Also, I notice your slight to the Pac-12 because they had an 11 seed in a play-in game. Well, the SEC had a 5 seed and an 8 seed lose, and had a 2 seed and 5 seed struggle with their opponents.

 

[Yo Tee]

Conferences aren't playing each other. Teams are.

Those teams are in conferences. So they represent the conferences they are a part of.

 

[SU Nittany Tide]

SEC doesn't have a higher win percentage than the Pac-12 due to the play in game. The play-in game is part of the tournament so why would we not count it? The Pac-12 is 3-1 in the NCAA tournament which is a % of .750 while the SEC is 5-2 which is a % of .714. You can't pick and choose which games you count. I'm not trying to convince anyone that the Pac-12 is better than the SEC. I'm saying that the Pac-12 has LOOKED better and has a better winning percentage in the tournament so far.

Also, I notice your slight to the Pac-12 because they had an 11 seed in a play-in game. Well, the SEC had a 5 seed and an 8 seed lose, and had a 2 seed and 5 seed struggle with their opponents.

I'm not going to try to convince you because you are going to go with what you want. Not many would agree with you.

To be fair, the SEC is the only conference with a 5 seed to win a game. B1G lost one of those as well.

 

[gob]

The fact that we aren't giving it to Wesson every possession is pissing me off