- Thread starter
- #1
Not being blown out but losing to a mediocre team seems to be a recurring theme in the Big10. I think they champhas lost to a team with 4 or more losses every year since 2011.Maybe they should talk to their conference champ about not getting blown out by a .500 team in consecutive years.
8-5 = .500?Maybe they should talk to their conference champ about not getting blown out by a .500 team in consecutive years.
Downvote for linking to that same clickbait website that people keep linking to on this subject.
Weird how they are the only ones reporting it, and you have to pay to see the content.
Expand it so a B1G team can get in and then get shutout? Interesting tactic.
You have to pay extra for the special sauces.Meanwhile, at places you don't have to pay for:
Though open for 'conversations,' college football leadership not pushing for playoff expansion
'Four works': Expanding College Football Playoff is not on agenda for decision-makers
I subscribe to The Athletic. It's actually really good content. Costs me $3.99/month.
It ain't my business what you spend your money on, but I'd never heard of it until this past week. And while I can't see the full articles, the titles to the pages being linked are clickbait and unless the article goes against the headline, isn't accurate.
He's only for it if the Rose Bowl can be the top dog and dictate dates.This might be the tipping point. Delany was formerly one of the most prominent anti-expansion people.
Well, you need to quit making your teams play a Murderer's Row (according to Gordon Gee) schedule without a break! You need to weave some FCS teams and bye dates later in the schedule to give 'em a break. The B1G champions wouldn't lose to those 4 loss teams if they were a little fresher instead of ground down.Not being blown out but losing to a mediocre team seems to be a recurring theme in the Big10. I think they champhas lost to a team with 4 or more losses every year since 2011.
This might be the tipping point. Delany was formerly one of the most prominent anti-expansion people.
The "second loss" concept is nothing more than an excuse. Used by fans who prefer the system that relies on debate. Because theres really no legitimate reason to expand. 11-2 while playing an extra game and winning a conference championship. Is better than 11-1 finishing 3rd in your division and playing an FCS team to pad wins....Ohio State has a 2-1 playoff record.
One team has a better winning pct.