Was Biggio clean?
Surely you jest. Him and his buddy Bagwell (along with others) openly joked about the shit they were doing. They didn't even try to hide it but then you get the elitest assholes who confront you with "prove it." what a joke.
Was Biggio clean?
You gotta be kidding me? Just shut the fuck up already! Miserable fucking lunatic. The point was we don't need Bonds to be found guilty to know he used PEDs and the HOF isn't a court of law. All you do is look for an argument because you are an angry bastard. I don't really have a problem with him making the HOF but if he doesn't, I would understand why.Therefore, the HOF is some sanctimonious place where only the morally superior are admitted even those whose performance everybody agrees were solid long before they are accused are shunned? And now we compare Barry Bonds a baseball layer whose only infringement is being accused of steroids use to a double murderer, OJ? Either we viscerally hate them because they both have the same skin color or we are very limited in our vocabulary when it comes to comparisons.
I agree with this 95%.I don't really have a problem with him making the HOF but if he doesn't, I would understand why.
today we have 4 more deserving players making it to the hall of fame. Biggio is the one I sort of wonder about. The 3 pitchers obviously did not juice up. Give these pitchers credit for striking out all the roid users. Johnson was so dominating. Martinez was a great pitcher. Smoltz overcame serious arm issues to have a great career and was one of the great post season pitchers ever. Barroid is a dink to put it nicely.
That's a good point. Yeah I would like to hear the reasoning why Clemens and not Bonds.I agree with this 95%.
The 5% disagreement comes from my stronger belief that he belongs vs your simple acceptance that he be in.
While I disagree with the argument to keep him out, I understand it, as long as you are consistent about it. I have no capability of understanding someone who votes yes on Clemens and no on Bonds (or vice-versa).
Surely you jest. Him and his buddy Bagwell (along with others) openly joked about the shit they were doing. They didn't even try to hide it but then you get the elitest assholes who confront you with "prove it." what a joke.
We had a ballot thread here within the last couple years and someone had Bonds but not Clemens. His reasoning was that he went down the list alphabetically, and by the time he willed in the holes on his ballot, there were no spots available after Bonds.That's a good point. Yeah I would like to hear the reasoning why Clemens and not Bonds.
How do you know that?
You gotta be kidding me? Just shut the fuck up already! Miserable fucking lunatic. The point was we don't need Bonds to be found guilty to know he used PEDs and the HOF isn't a court of law. All you do is look for an argument because you are an angry bastard. I don't really have a problem with him making the HOF but if he doesn't, I would understand why.