ChiSoxFan
FC Bayern Forever #1
SP- Billy Pierce
What stat does Joe Jackson not measure up in?This would be the lineup, bench, and rotation according to the Hall of Stats.
C: Ted Simmons
1B: Rafael Palmeiro
2B: Lou Whitaker
SS: Bill Dahlen
3B: Graig Nettles
LF: Pete Rose
CF: Kenny Lofton
RF: Reggie Smith
Bench:
C: Joe Torre
1B/3B: Mark McGwire
2B/SS: Alan Trammell
OF: Dwight Evans
OF: Jim Edmonds
Rotation:
SP: Kevin Brown
SP: Rick Reuschel
SP: Luis Tiant
SP: David Cone
SP: Bret Saberhagen
What stat does Joe Jackson not measure up in?
Against Pete Rose? LongevityWhat stat does Joe Jackson not measure up in?
Good call, dude had a 7 year span where he averaged about 45 HR's and 115 RBI's.Has Albert Belle been mentioned?
Good call, dude had a 7 year span where he averaged about 45 HR's and 115 RBI's.
lol, MR FreezeReputation as an all time douche bag, and looking at his career, probably the only thing that has kept him out
If you are making an all-time team, left field has to start with Pete Rose or Joe Jackson. So it's no surprise that Belle doesn't make it on these.Reputation as an all time douche bag, and looking at his career, probably the only thing that has kept him out
I think he's between 15-20, but who ahead of him is A) Not in the HOF and B) No longer on the ballot C)Not active. I agree on McGwire, but then who? Maybe Dick Allen or Keith Hernandez?Never understood why palmeiro gets so much respect... I don't even think he is a top 20 1B of all time...
I think he's between 15-20, but who ahead of him is A) Not in the HOF and B) No longer on the ballot C)Not active. I agree on McGwire, but then who? Maybe Dick Allen or Keith Hernandez?
I like to compare peaks over career stats. Here are some stats (ALA stands for "above league average")I like Boog powell, and Norm cash over him... anyday... Imo, the problem with career stats is that we forget the dominance of a player during their prime...
I like to compare peaks over career stats. Here are some stats (ALA stands for "above league average")
Palmeiro (1988-2002): 2307 games, 4.4 WAR per season, BA 9.7% ALA, OBP 10.9% ALA, SLG 25.4% ALA, OPS 18.9% ALA, 4 All-Star Games, 10 seasons with MVP votes
Cash (1960-1973): 1965 games, 3.7 WAR per season, BA 6.2% ALA, OBP 14.0% ALA, SLG 25.8% ALA, OPS 20.4% ALA, 4 All-Star Games, 6 seasons with MVP votes
Powell (1963-1975): 1769 games, 3.1 WAR per season, BA 7.1% ALA, OBP 14.0% ALA, SLG 25.7% ALA, OPS 20.1% ALA, 4 All-Star Games, 6 seasons with MVP votes
Seems like that's really close, and Palmeiro had the longer peak. No doubt Cash had the best individual season in 1961.
Id put Pete at third and ditch Nettles if we're going off counting stats.
Well Palmeiro was top 10 in wRC+ 7 times, Cash 6 times, and Powell 5 times. Also Palmeiro was top 10 in WAR for 5 seasons, Cash 3, and Powell 2. I don't understand the second part, what do you mean by "treating the stats the same"?that is what made palmeiro so good... he was consistently very good... But he was very rarely great, especially for his era...
speaking of his era, I like Jason Giambi better...
Even when looking at players peaks, there is more to look at than treating the stats the same...
I will ask this question and it is purely hypothetical, and made up, not based on any player...
Player A has a longer peak with overall better numbers during his peak.
Player B has more top 10 offensive seasons in MLB, with more top 5 as well...
who was better?? Now I get that the question is too vague to make a good answer, but it brings up the question, how much should era be brought into account??
I guess.Pete's got more than twice as many games in the outfield as he does at 3B. I know that almost half of those were in RF or CF, but for this exercise I think that LF is the right choice for him.