Those cheating seahawks

[fastforward]

The issue is gambling related. The owners are making money from fantasy football. If they're not fully disclosing information they're open to accusations of running rigged games. I feel sorry for the Seahawks here. Their offence is minor but the NFL probably needs the penalty to be seen to be draconian.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Geez that was stupid on the Seahawks part, that's all I can say.

 

[Vitamike]

Pete just can't escape this cheater stamp he seemingly brought with him from his college coaching days.

• PED's (Adderall scandal)
  
• OTA v1
• OTA v2
• Injury report v1

What's next Pete?

 

[boogiewithstu2007]

if he is going to start BSing and lying, then hit 'em with the Hein

Nothing would have ever even come out about this but Pete told the press not thinking about it... lol ... I think he slipped .. I just heard it on sports radio...

 

[SeattleCoug]

Pete just can't escape this cheater stamp he seemingly brought with him from his college coaching days.

• PED's (Adderall scandal)
  
• OTA v1
• OTA v2
• Injury report v1

What's next Pete?

And I can't say that wasn't in the back of my head when he was hired. Luckily for Hawks fans the good has heavily outweighed the bad. You can say the same about his time as USC.

 

[Hank Kingsley]

Far be it from me to gloat at something shitty happening to the Canal Pheasants.

The Ideal Gas law doesn't apply in this situation.

But Dez still would have caught the fucking ball.

 

[Vitamike]

You can say the same about his time as USC.

Some could, but I couldn't or wouldn't.

No official National Titles during his tenure at SC.

2003 National Title officially belongs to LSU, but Pete & SC want to claim a split title even though they signed off (As all coaches and AD's did) on conceding the NT in the event the AP didn't agree.

2004 National Title officially belongs to nobody as Pete's Trojans had to vacate the win for rules violations.

I'm glad for the few Seahawk players and fans I like, that they got their SB win, but IMO the same can't be said for those players and fans at SC.

 

[Duffman]

Every time I look at Pete I can't help but remember how he's a truther and it makes me dislike him, his coaching style is great but I just can't stand to look at him without getting disgusted.

 

[The Oldtimer]

Is a NFL team suppose to report all injuries, even an ingrown toenail? Sherman played the games, so what's the big deal?

"All players with significant or noteworthy injuries must be listed on the report, even if the player takes all the reps in practice, and even if the team is certain that he will play in the upcoming game. This is especially true of key players and those players whose injuries have been covered extensively by the media". Question, was Sherman's injury "significant or noteworthy and was his injury covered extensively by the media"?

 

[The Oldtimer]

Some could, but I couldn't or wouldn't.

No official National Titles during his tenure at SC.

2003 National Title officially belongs to LSU, but Pete & SC want to claim a split title even though they signed off (As all coaches and AD's did) on conceding the NT in the event the AP didn't agree.

2004 National Title officially belongs to nobody as Pete's Trojans had to vacate the win for rules violations.

I'm glad for the few Seahawk players and fans I like, that they got their SB win, but IMO the same can't be said for those players and fans at SC.

The 2004 (2003 season) National title was a split title between USC and LSU. USC won the AP National Title and LSU won the Coaches title. Both teams have a trophy. As far as an USC fans I will always consider USC as the 2004 National Champions, but that is just my opinion.

 

[The Oldtimer]

The 2004 (2003 season) National title was a split title between USC and LSU. USC won the AP National Title and LSU won the Coaches title. Both teams have a trophy. As far as an USC fans I will always consider USC as the 2004 National Champions, but that is just my opinion.

The Associated Press was not tied to the Bowl Championship Series, and the trophy could be awarded to a team which did not win the BCS National Championship Game. This has happened once after the 2003 season when LSU won the BCS title game, but USC received a higher total of votes in the AP Poll, and therefore received the AP National Championship Trophy. Teams serving NCAA postseason bans are still eligible for the AP National Championship.

USC will still display the 2003 and 2004 AP national championship trophies at Heritage Hall. They are still back-to-back national champions"

 

[The Oldtimer]

Every time I look at Pete I can't help but remember how he's a truther and it makes me dislike him, his coaching style is great but I just can't stand to look at him without getting disgusted.

LOL, well then don't look at him.

 

[Judge Fudge]

Thank the CBA. Judge, jury and executioner say it and it shall be done. Das NFL Fuhrer

 

[Vitamike]

The 2004 (2003 season) National title was a split title between USC and LSU. USC won the AP National Title and LSU won the Coaches title.

The BCS was created to end split titles though, and the Champion was to be determined by the winner of the two teams selected to the BCS title game.

The AFCA, who Pete was a part of, was contractually bound to vote the winner of the BCS title game as the National Champion, and the contract was signed by each conference which required them to recognize the winner of the BCS National Championship game as the official and only champion.

So even though SC won the AP title, it is not an official title, and should not be recognized because Pete, and the PAC10 agreed, that they would only recognize the one Champion, and in 2003 season that was LSU.

 

[eaglesnut]

That team is boring as all hell to watch. Just ban them.

 

[DirtDirtDirt]

This would rank up there as one of the dumbest penalties handed out ive ever seen

 

[Yankee Traveler]

Did the Colts get any discipline for not disclosing Luck's rib injury?

They will probably receive Seattle's 2nd rounder as compensation for having a drug addict owner.

 

[Judge Fudge]

That team is boring as all hell to watch. Just ban them.

And which team made the playoffs and has a SB trophy in their trophy case?

 

[The Oldtimer]

The BCS was created to end split titles though, and the Champion was to be determined by the winner of the two teams selected to the BCS title game.

The AFCA, who Pete was a part of, was contractually bound to vote the winner of the BCS title game as the National Champion, and the contract was signed by each conference which required them to recognize the winner of the BCS National Championship game as the official and only champion.

So even though SC won the AP title, it is not an official title, and should not be recognized because Pete, and the PAC10 agreed, that they would only recognize the one Champion, and in 2003 season that was LSU.

Sorry you're wrong.

"The Associated Press was not tied to the Bowl Championship Series, and the trophy could be awarded to a team which did not win the BCS National Championship Game. This has happened once after the 2003 season when LSU won the BCS title game, but USC received a higher total of votes in the AP Poll, and therefore received the AP National Championship Trophy. Teams serving NCAA postseason bans are still eligible for the AP National Championship.

USC will still display the 2003 and 2004 AP national championship trophies at Heritage Hall. They are still back-to-back national champions"

 

[Battlelyon]

Agreed man, a 2nd round pick would be a very harsh punishment... Obviously Pete made a mistake, I guess he thought it was reported, but Sherman clearly wasn't the same the last part of the season... But he was playing through it and wasn't hobbling around or anything...

Made a mistake