WizardHawk
Release the Kraken - Fuck the Canucks
Rating is usually the top stat and there hasn't ever been a time in their career that Rosen had a better one. Try completion percentage last year as well which is another key stat.
It is a 3 year build and this is year 2. Next year it will be completed.
Same place my friend.
Meh, they have each been given this sort of praise.Which is why I said his most impressive quality is his presnap reads and his vision.
No it's not a 'System' thing. It's a 'QB System' thing.And yards as a stat? That's a system thing. Falk will always have more yards than even the top QB's in the country. Rosen had more yards, but not yards per attempt which is the great equalizer. So I'll still stand by Browning having had a little better season.
You can try to distort what I said, but it's not going to work. Browning had a better season last year. I was clear about that. His overall stats were indeed better. Not debatable. That doesn't mean there isn't any category that Rosen didn't have something better. Rosen did have more TD's. When you look at the totality Browning was better. Comp %, Rating, YPA, etc. Those are key measures of QB's and all favored Browning. Period.No it's not a 'System' thing. It's a 'QB System' thing.
Dude you are really having trouble with this, aren't you.
FYI All teams run an 'Offensive System' and some teams run 'QB Systems'. They are not the same, and Josh was not in a 'QB System' last year.
So at least you're now conceding that Browning's stats were just a little better last season, too bad about that PAC Freshman player of the Year that obviously was stolen from Jake LY.
Or maybe you just know much more than the rest of the world.
I weep for you
A wind's a comin' .....
If you weren't a self loathing coug you'd have more pride in your own and join in.Anyone else find the irony, UW fans in one year have flipped with their identical fan base in Oregon. Last year we were hearing about how great Adams was and how he was the best QB in the conference because we were including FCS stats. And at this last year they were going in every thread posting about the score of their little rivalry game.
Of course he is. Or at least he's softened up on him a lot. Almost as much as we have softened up on Smith.So now that the Cougz are winning...is wazzygazzou ok?
Leach and all...
We know. You can smell Pullman from Ellensburg. Luckily we have a few large hills to block the stench over here.
Almost as much as we have softened up on Smith.
Probably good for the team, but sucks for the fans. Have to watch all the other teams without a game of our own to watch. Couple of good matches to watch though if the power doesn't go out.You shut your whore mouf!
BTW...
Must be great to have weekend off in CF...heals the aches before the next big test.
That late game between the cougs and bruins should be a good one to watch.
If you weren't a self loathing coug you'd have more pride in your own and join in.
I was pretty sick of hearing all the praise for Rosen last year when he wasn't nearly as good as he was getting credit for. And I said as much last year. This isn't new. The new part was vita bringing it up and discounting Browning's play to support his suggestion that Rosen is better. I strongly disagree. Sue me.
And whatever you are trying to say about the ducks and Adams is kind of Adams was a great QB. The only knock on him was he wasn't smart and was a rent an arm. He was clearly a better QB last year than Rosen or Browning was, but he was a 5th year Sr so no shit.
Stanford has McCaffrey. Oregon has Freeman. USC Juju and a couple of others. Every team has players their fans rightly back as among the best in the country if not the conference. Nothing new there. We have Browning and Baker as the names most know from the team. Maybe Gaskin too, but this year he's been splitting duty with Coleman.
I mean it's shocking a fan of a team who's QB is currently in the top 5 of most Heisman watch lists is supporting them isn't it? Just shocking I tell you.
So honest opinions aren't welcome here anymore. And sharing what has been said about players is no longer welcome here anymore. Just remember that. You can no longer talk about any of your players and how good you think they are.Yeah but you're bringing in some "people think he's like Montana" "he's the best Ive ever seen at pre snap drills" . You need to pump the brakes a little dude.
I knew you would cherry pick stats to fit your argument, even though those stat lines you are claiming are the 'key measures' are pretty damned close.You can try to distort what I said, but it's not going to work. Browning had a better season last year. I was clear about that. His overall stats were indeed better. Not debatable. That doesn't mean there isn't any category that Rosen didn't have something better. Rosen did have more TD's. When you look at the totality Browning was better. Comp %, Rating, YPA, etc. Those are key measures of QB's and all favored Browning. Period.