• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

"The only reason we know Tom Brady is because of the Tuck Rule." - Ray Lewis

HammerDown

Well-Known Member
Supporting Member Level 3
68,257
5,320
533
Joined
Dec 21, 2012
Hoopla Cash
$ 198.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
he used to. now he on pregame shows talking with a mouth full of marbles

Have you seen him and Trent Dilfer and Steve Young out there on the field yucking it up in their skinny-suits, pretending like they're friends? That has got to be the most absurd thing I've ever seen. :L
 

Cyder

Justin
41,849
20,447
1,033
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Have you seen him and Trent Dilfer and Steve Young out there on the field yucking it up in their skinny-suits, pretending like they're friends? That has got to be the most absurd thing I've ever seen. :L


I can't watch any of it. No post game, no pre game, no half time.
 

SonnyCID

Conocido Miembro
9,626
892
113
Joined
Apr 21, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 100.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Ray needs to stop talking before we all forget what a great player he was.
 

Hornsstampede2.0

Guy Who Never Responds
13,352
3,564
293
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
Ellicott City, MD
Hoopla Cash
$ 3,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
It is an interesting theory:

1. Bill Belichek was an abysmal failure in 5 years at Cleveland.
2. He sucked ass his first year in New England (5-11)
3. He started 0-2, but got a little hot to make the playoffs as a 2 seed
4. TUCK RULE
5. They missed the playoffs altogether in 2002 at 9-7


If you make one tiny little change #4 to FUMBLE CONFIRMED


Then Belichek would be a guy 8 years in the league, without a single playoff win.
I am not sure Belichek doesn't get canned after 2002 in that scenario.
He might never had a chance to win in 2003 and 2004


So, there is some plausible logic behind it.
That is not hating. It is just an interesting "what if".
 

TheRobotDevil

Immortal
133,822
57,722
1,033
Joined
Jul 30, 2010
Location
Southern Calabama
Hoopla Cash
$ 666.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Call Ray Lewis what you want he us correct. The tuck rule was the first IOC many sketchy events in the tarnished New England patriots franchise
 

PatsFan2003

Well-Known Member
35,813
7,828
533
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Location
The People's Republic of Massachusetts
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
And instead we've had almost 13 years now of the Patriots being one of the best franchises in the league.

Imagine that.

13 years of Tom Brady and Bill Belichick!!

I'm glad I'm a Patriots fan... :)
 

Oldschool739

It's my Country, Flag, Bible, Gun. Don't try it !
7,642
989
113
Joined
Nov 30, 2013
Location
Baltimore
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I reckon I'm gonna have to kill you emhaaa

polls_3679033_gal_5213_733523_poll_xlarge.jpeg

Ah-ight den !!.......:lol: I loved that movie ...........
 

redseat

Well-Known Member
55,942
9,692
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 943.33
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
At times like this I actually miss pussies like bradyjustwins and JasonCarrier crashing into threads like this yelling, screaming and threatening bloody murder. :L

Did you ban them?
 

Dude

Well-Known Member
16,137
5,093
533
Joined
Jul 20, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,999.86
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
It is an interesting theory:

1. Bill Belichek was an abysmal failure in 5 years at Cleveland.
2. He sucked ass his first year in New England (5-11)
3. He started 0-2, but got a little hot to make the playoffs as a 2 seed
4. TUCK RULE
5. They missed the playoffs altogether in 2002 at 9-7


If you make one tiny little change #4 to FUMBLE CONFIRMED


Then Belichek would be a guy 8 years in the league, without a single playoff win.
I am not sure Belichek doesn't get canned after 2002 in that scenario.
He might never had a chance to win in 2003 and 2004


So, there is some plausible logic behind it.
That is not hating. It is just an interesting "what if".


Oooh I love the "what if" analysis structure, it makes everythang possible!
 

NEhomer

Well-Known Member
18,356
7,341
533
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 944.55
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
It is an interesting theory:

1. Bill Belichek was an abysmal failure in 5 years at Cleveland.
2. He sucked ass his first year in New England (5-11)
3. He started 0-2, but got a little hot to make the playoffs as a 2 seed
4. TUCK RULE
5. They missed the playoffs altogether in 2002 at 9-7


If you make one tiny little change #4 to FUMBLE CONFIRMED


Then Belichek would be a guy 8 years in the league, without a single playoff win.
I am not sure Belichek doesn't get canned after 2002 in that scenario.
He might never had a chance to win in 2003 and 2004


So, there is some plausible logic behind it.
That is not hating. It is just an interesting "what if".

Although I think you overstate it, I do agree that continuing on to win that first SB added to his value significantly and locked him into the starting position the following fall. I have also always stated that the tuck rule call was indeed bullshit. He was going to become a great QB at some point.
 

boogiewithstu2007

Well-Known Member
17,058
4,301
293
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
We wouldn't have known about Brady so much that year, but that Pats team was talented ,and would a made noise again the next year... So we still would a heard about Brady... I think Ray's just trying to make a point that the NFL has too many dam rules... A fumble should be a fumble and a catch should be a catch ... Ball was still in Brady's had and he fumbled the ball... Ball hit's the ground in anyway it's not a catch.. Simplify the game and stop making it so complicated...
 

Rex Racer

Ireverrent Member
49,430
10,063
1,033
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Location
NH
Hoopla Cash
$ 5,289.96
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
We wouldn't have known about Brady so much that year, but that Pats team was talented ,and would a made noise again the next year... So we still would a heard about Brady... I think Ray's just trying to make a point that the NFL has too many dam rules... A fumble should be a fumble and a catch should be a catch ... Ball was still in Brady's had and he fumbled the ball... Ball hit's the ground in anyway it's not a catch.. Simplify the game and stop making it so complicated...
So you would agree that Dez Bryant made the catch?
 

scoutyjones2

Well-Known Member
7,568
2,760
293
Joined
Jul 14, 2013
Location
Pacific NW
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I believe his statement that the ball hits the ground in anyway, it's not a catch would indicate he doesn't believe Dez made the catch.
 
Top