Fans vote on the best teams online....Its opinion like the current system AP polls,Coaches polls......
I don't know how you have the patience to fuck with him. It's like arguing with a 12 year old burnout.He was joking you twit.
Same difference.....He was joking you twit.
Again, you want to offer up spun bullshit as some sort of slam dunk fact when it isn't, about a problem that doesn't exist, and offer up something else instead that actually WOULD kill OOC games and give us less worthy teams in a bloated playoff.
Well he is a bit perma tweaked off that shit he smokes, no doubt about that.
Again i'm going to agree to disagree. The logic is irrefutable thats why people will veer off topic when the discussion is brought up. Thats what one does when they have no legitimate rebuttal.
That's rich. You haven't stayed on topic yet and accuse others of veering off course?Again i'm going to agree to disagree. The logic is irrefutable thats why people will veer off topic when the discussion is brought up. Thats what one does when they have no legitimate rebuttal.
The selection process has major holes in it. As we have seen clearly over the past two years. The committee has no set guidelines or criteria in regards to the selection process. I gave you two prime examples. No matter how you spin it an 11-2 team that won their conference. And played a stronger schedule. Is a better team than an 11-1 team that failed to win their conference or division. That played a weaker SOS. This is logic. What we have now is teams being rewarded for playing more meaningless regular season games....Whether it be regular season schedules being watered down. Or taking the meaning out of CCG's
As far as gauging teams based on "the eye test" etc....You would have to be working on a level platform. Whether it be conferences all conferences playing an 8 game or 9 game conference schedule. With 2 P5 and a G5 or 3 P5 and a G5 etc....If its not uniform its nothing more than opinion.
Or expanding the play offs with auto bids. And at large to fill the "eye test" slots. Which lowers the level of off the field human influence and raises actual competition levels.I prefer Championships being decided on the field. If you're ok with Championships being decided off the field. Thats fine but right now its nothing more than
When you can refute the facts i have provided in the scenarios over the past two years. And actually justify a team that finished with the same amount of wins that played a weaker schedule and finished 2nd in their division. Being better than a team that had an equal amount of wins that earned the right to play in their CCG an extra game. And won their conference. With something concrete. Then I'll listen.....The system needs an upgrade. if they want the best possible product and a true champion..........
You make up bullshit and attempt to call it facts. That's not staying on topic. Why do you do this? Because you can't have your arguments without doing that and you know it. I don't need to justify anything as you haven't provided any real reason outside you don't like it to refute the committees results. Those are not facts, they are opinions. And it is the opinion of nearly everyone else that the system isn't perfect and can't ever be, but is FAR better than any other proposed alternative. That's a fact. Their own fans don't believe they belonged in the playoffs after that embarrassing loss, but you know more right?
If its not about CFB its veering off topic.....Pretty sure the committee doesn't factor in my smoking legal weed etc.....That's rich. You haven't stayed on topic yet and accuse others of veering off course?
You want to make blanket claims in a vacuum without context. No sir, a 11-2 conf winner is not always better than an 11-1 non conf winner. that is subjective at best in your opinion of one matchup. The fact that people who study this for a living and LIVE this stuff do not agree with you is proof enough your blanket claim is bullshit and not some altruistic all encompassing fact.
Ohio State lost at home pretty badly to Oklahoma early in the season. That game alone wouldn't have derailed them as that was a quality team and fairly early in the season. They were never in that game and lost by more than 2 TD's. Then they got entirely blown out by a bad Iowa team. Lost 55-24
Then what? Bama smoked #1 seed clemson and went on to win it all. But no, they weren't one of the top 4 teams to you.
That's a special level of derp. Clearly they were one of the best teams in the country as they won the damned playoffs!
You fail.
Again.
Don't make me go pull back out ALL of the support that came for that decision. One made really hard by flawed teams with major issues. It wasn't Bama's fault and not some conspiracy. Ohio State got blown the fuck out. They could ONLY blame themselves. Period. End of discussion.
First of all, I responded to bamabear about your lack of grip on reality, not you. Second of all I wasn't wrong either way.
College football board....If your stance isn't college football related. They definitely need to make changes to the selection and play off system imo
Alright this one actually made me laugh out loud. "DEEP FILM STUDY"
You are clearly farther gone tonight than normal.
BOTH TEAMS WON 11 GAMES. BOTH OF THEM. One only lost a single game and didn't get blown out. The other lost twice and once was a REALLY REALLY REALLY bad loss. This isn't rocket science.
There isn't one right answer. Either would have been acceptable. They were 1a and 1b. Show us some major outlet that had a beef with the selection. Give us articles on someone else buying into your lame alternatives and on board with your paranoid conspiracy bullshit. YOU CAN'T.
Five former head coaches on the committee did deep film study on both teams. But clarkly knows more.
Doing autobids and blindly putting teams in just because you are afraid of tough decisions is dumb. It kills OOC, it kills any need to have your conf stay strong as there is zero measure against other conf at all, it punishes great teams and ends their season if they aren't tops of their full conference, blindly rewards even 3 or 4 loss teams potentially and makes no sense at all.
You claim the current system needs uniform scheduling and yet auto bids goes as far away from that idea as is entirely possible. The ONLY way you can make an auto bid work would be to just get rid of all but one OOC and make the Pac play 11 conf games. That is REQUIRED. No need for a CCG anymore, just take the winner with tiebreakers. And doing that means the win/loss of the Pac has zero relationships to the win/loss of the B1G or anyone else. It is basically 10 separate leagues entirely with select winners facing off in some weird playoff and treats them all as if they had commonality. Second place? Too bad. You might be better than 5 other teams in the playoffs, but go home anyway. We only want the winners of even the shittiest of crappy conferences, not really good quality teams worth seeing in the playoffs.
Dumb
Definitely more viable than determining the 4 best teams on the field. With actual strength of schedule and CCGS being moot. All SC has to do is water down the schedule play meaningless regular season games. And find a legit coach and their set. They can get George Lucas and Spielberg to review the film. And just make it look pretty so they're "Cast" in the play offs in the future
Kentucky looked awful too. But its not about playing a stronger schedule or winning your conference. Its all about the Deep film review......Champions are decided by the media,coaches and Committee opinions.....
Right, a system with no decisions to be made that entirely destroys college football and leaves some of the best teams in the country home every year is SO much better.Alright this one actually made me laugh out loud. "DEEP FILM STUDY"
Yes lets let coaches, a committee, the AP decide who the 4 best teams are. Definitely no room for human error or bias. The difference I'm using actual numbers and accomplishments. You entire argument is based off of opinions. A team with 11 wins and a conference champion i> a team with 11 wins that finished 3rd in their conference. Thats actual math.....Right, a system with no decisions to be made that entirely destroys college football and leaves some of the best teams in the country home every year is SO much better.
There's a reason you can't/won't speak to all of the points brought up against autobid playoffs. It isn't viable.
