thunderc
Well-Known Member
IdiotsMavs really gave a team in their conference Luka lol
Dealing with Luka 3+ times per year is an interesting choice.
IdiotsMavs really gave a team in their conference Luka lol
Dealing with Luka 3+ times per year is an interesting choice.
Bad enough trading him but trading him in conference is a death sentenceMavs really gave a team in their conference Luka lol
Dealing with Luka 3+ times per year is an interesting choice.
7 in a row for PhillyClaxton with the buzzer beater
I'm curious about what the Lakers doctors saw. Assuming there was legit concern rather than thinking they want to save the assets they were sending for someone better over the summer...I'd expect that they must think he's going to be another Andrew Bynum 2.0.
I also have to wonder about the Hornets...they wanted to move him bad enough that they tried to get the league to not let the Lakers back out.
So, one side nixes a trade for a player who literally everyone was saying fills a glaring need, and the other side doesn't want him back badly enough that they try to force the other side to take him.
Seems like someone is lying.
I’ll give you one guess which one it is….
To depend on him for the future, not today.The Lakers thought he was to broken to accept.
I’m not sure that’s how failing a physical works.To depend on him for the future, not today.
If you lose to the Nets at a point in the season when you need every win possible you are simply done.
If you lose to the Nets at a point in the season when you need every win possible you are simply done.