msgkings322
I'm just here to troll everyone
Yep. By far the smallest roster in the all star games vs number of teamsBanchero had a 30 point triple double last night
NBA need to increase all star rosters to 15 per conference
Yep. By far the smallest roster in the all star games vs number of teamsBanchero had a 30 point triple double last night
NBA need to increase all star rosters to 15 per conference
Wilder lost CONVINCINGLY.lol clown didn’t this dude beat fury but got robbed?
Wilder being the overrated fighter he is forced his hand though. That was supposed to be his next 2 fights
The point is there are too few all stars each year with 15 teams in each conferenceHow many teams play 13 guys?
None.
That was a procedural move by the NBA a few years ago to make it easier for teams to juggle actives and inactives seamlessly.
Every year there are multiple guys playing 10 minutes or less with 12. We don’t need to expand rosters and muddy that even more.
Yep. By far the smallest roster in the all star games vs number of teams
Wiggins!Stevens told the Boston media yesterday that "Ownership has given me the go-ahead to do whatever is necessary to hang that 18th banner. Right now I think we'll be looking for a big wing."
Olynyk? He was mentioned by Forsberg as a possibility. Who else is available and at what cost??
Yeah, but that was a totally unnecessary mess of their own making.
And that to me just means they aren’t the biggest loser.
Not every trade has a winner.
Sometimes everybody wins, sometimes both sides lose.
It's just the all star game no one cares about the game that gets played. Too many all star level players don't get the nodUmmm…
Because you can only play 5 at a time in basketball.
Silly to compare to other sports.
Roster size is based on how many guys you can play, not how many teams are in the league.
Oh my you're apparently one of the 10 people that still watch itI disagree.
Because I want to see the headliners get their 30 minutes in the all star game.
When it can be the difference between a guy getting a extra 30 mil in a contract, I disagree.How many teams play 13 guys?
None.
That was a procedural move by the NBA a few years ago to make it easier for teams to juggle actives and inactives seamlessly.
Every year there are multiple guys playing 10 minutes or less with 12. We don’t need to expand rosters and muddy that even more.
You hate to see itLakers will trade for him and he'll immediately start shooting 29% from 3
When it can be the difference between a guy getting a extra 30 mil in a contract, I disagree.
The NBA has been muddying shit up for their own benefit for years.
The play in games, the in season tourney….all designed to put more coin in their pockets via TV deals, streaming rights.
What’s so wrong with doing something that directly benefits the players?
Are you kidding? New to the forum? I don't want the extra all stars because of the game itselfLOL.
Why are you even discussing this if you don’t watch the game?
Hey, maybe he can have a Cole Swider moment and single-handedly pull one out with a game winner?Our season is saved!!!!
That never happens thoughI disagree.
Because I want to see the headliners get their 30 minutes in the all star game.
Yeah, but that begins another discussion altogether.
I also am strongly against tying player contract eligibility to accolades that are decided somewhat whimsically.
That needs to change for sure.
Dude….I disagree.
Because I want to see the headliners get their 30 minutes in the all star game.
I lied lol. It happens but not frequently.That never happens though