logic
Well-Known Member
I did disagree with you (in very few words) but did not miss the main point. You say drafting out of high school puts too much hope on kids to save franchises. But it is no different than drafting after one, two of even all four years of college. Sure, you have more time to evaluate their work, but franchises still expect their high draft pick to turn their franchise around. How often does the #1 pick actually do that for a team? The answer is rarely. The problem isn't drafting from high school, college, or overseas, it is pinning your franchise's hopes on one guy. There are few talents that can do that no matter what age they are drafted. I think players should be able to enter the draft when they are ready, high school or college; The onus is on the team drafting.And this is a lot of words to say "I disagree and simply glossed over the main premise of the post". The point is, and in large part because of LeBron's impact, is that we as fans give ourselves too much false hope that these teens to come in and turn a franchise around the way he did however long ago it was.
While Zion may be the one exception to that, even he has yet to prove he can shake the injury bug from this his rookie campaign as well as his one season at Duke.
How would you enforce this, though? Because if the said player falls into the second round, he instantly becomes of limited priority to the team that drafted him, and his career would be essentially wasted and unjustifiably so...