- Thread starter
- #1
RevSader
In Beltre we trust.
Go Rangers keep it rolling!
Go Rangers keep it rolling!
Go Rangers keep it rolling!
My power rankings are based on the team I want to watch most.Sexy's Power Rankings
1 BRAVES (72-46)
2 TIGERS (69-47)
3 DODGERS (67-50)
4 RANGERS (69-50)
5 RED SOX (71-49)
6 PIRATES (70-47)
7 CARDINALS (67-50)
8 RAYS (66-50)
9 A'S (67-50)
10 REDS (65-52)
11 ORIOLES (65-52)
12 ROYALS (61-54)
13 INDIANS (63-55)
14 D-BACKS (59-57)
15 YANKEES (59-57)
I have the Rangers up above the Sox, Pirates, Cards. Bite me.
31. A's.My power rankings are based on the team I want to watch most.
1. Texas Rangers
2-30. IDGAF
lololMy power rankings are based on the team I want to watch most.
1. Texas Rangers
2-30. IDGAF
Sexy's Power Rankings
1 BRAVES (72-46)
2 TIGERS (69-47)
3 DODGERS (67-50)
4 RANGERS (69-50)
5 RED SOX (71-49)
6 PIRATES (70-47)
7 CARDINALS (67-50)
8 RAYS (66-50)
9 A'S (67-50)
10 REDS (65-52)
11 ORIOLES (65-52)
12 ROYALS (61-54)
13 INDIANS (63-55)
14 D-BACKS (59-57)
15 YANKEES (59-57)
I have the Rangers up above the Sox, Pirates, Cards. Bite me.
Their fans..?Who cares about NL teams?
I thought Houston was done with the A's?
So when does their schedule get tougher?
Their fans..?
... but not us.
If they want a NL Power Rankings list ... fine. But combining something as irrelevant as power rankings into a single list has zero relevance and utility. Why have a list of who is at the bottom? They already know they are on the bottom. Only need the top 5 in each league ... but again ... power rankings have zero to do with standings. If it has zero to do with standings ... it is a waste of bytes.