JDM
New Member
Wilfork is dirty?
Since fucking when?
Since fucking when?
This is taken from another poster on another board:
"Mark Schlereth was just defending Suh on Sports Center.
Jeff Saturday was talking about how there's no place for Suh's hit, and Schlereth, a former o-lineman, said he saw a guy going for an opponent's waist on a play that's coached to all defensive players across the league. He went on to say that Suh still has to know better, but that this wasn't the dirty play that all of the talking Parrots want it to be..."
Wilfork is dirty?
Since fucking when?
Since A Pats fan said Suh was dirty.
Suh's reputation is clearly catching up with him.
The fine is like a career reminder that he has been an ass in the past.
IMO the play was stupid. It cost Detroit a TD in a close game at that time. My problem is he is apt to the stupid penalty and yes the dirty penalty. But this was clearly a stupid penalty and you can't clearly say it was dirty as that has to do more with intent.
Had the whistle blown? No so you play to the whistle had blown the guy was chasing down the Levy so he was still in the play....would not have caught him but he was still live.
The initial impact was above the knee below the waist I am getting tired of the so call experts saying he dived for his knees.
I am pretty sure not many Pat fans watch the Lions game.....just the ESPN highlight. What they don't show is the number of times Suh had his hands on Ponder when he had just released the ball and didn't drive him to the turf. Suh had a great game just it was and is being over shadowed by this play.
The same thing could be said of every player that gets flagged for a horse collar. It used to be legal it isn't anymore so that must make a guy that has 2-3 horse collar penalties dirty?
or since he got 4 fines in one year for cheap shots. I admit he has cleaned it up. You have on your roster a player who followed a similar path that Suh did. I am not sure Suh has the maturity to clean it up like Wilfork has, but I hope he does.
Okay so knowing that chop blocks are illegal, knowing the O Linemen could not see Suh, did Suh really expect to fall or roll up?
Don't really care what the one supposed person you found says. Again and I am dumdfounded how this escapes you.
A COMMITTEE SAT AND VIEWED THE PLAY. A COMMITTEE VIEWD IT AS DIRTY AND MADE THEIR RECOMMENDATION.
Committee: committee - definition of committee by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
A chop block is diving at the knees of a player who is already engaged with another player....not what Suh did
I think Suh's was a cut block, which is not always illegal but they are during change of posession. Chop Blocks are crazy dangerous and the league would have suspended Suh for sure if he had done that.
Banning cut blocks (which was still not even the intent) is retarded. Fuck the NFL.
The ref called it an illeagel LOW block
Banning cut blocks (which was still not even the intent) is retarded. Fuck the NFL.
Cut Block/Low Block/Block Below the waist are all the same thing, just different names. Chop block is cut block that happens to a player that is already being blocked.
Chop blocks should absolutely be illegal and probably an automatic suspension. Pretty much a guaranteed injury.
Cut blocks do not have a high risk of injury, and are perfectly legal on most plays.
Chop blocks and cut blocks are decidedly different.