Yo Tee
Well-Known Member
Washington pounded USC like a hawt little step daughter yet SC is on there and no UW.
USC beat Utah. Washington lost to a 4-6 Stanford team. There's your answer.
Washington pounded USC like a hawt little step daughter yet SC is on there and no UW.
What don’t you like about FEI?
Serious question
Washington pounded USC like a hawt little step daughter yet SC is on there and no UW.
I’m not sure I have a legitimate answer on the FEI.
BUT, I can tell you what I don’t like about the rankings in the link.
1. Nevada has wins over Purdue and San Diego State and they’re ranked behind 1-9 South Alabama who has a win over Jackson State
2. Louisiana Lafayette is 0-2 against top 50 teams and ranked ahead of Appalachian State who is 2-0 against top 50 with a head to head win over Louisiana Lafayette
3. I just feel like these rankings are not legitimate enough to be used when considering what’s a top 50 win and what isn’t. Unc is a top 50 win, but UVA isn’t.
I get ya, it's not a resume rankings. Its main purpose to rate offensive and defensive efficiency and adjust for SOS in a way. It's similar to SP+ except that's now behind ESPN+ paywall . Maybe it's not best at determining who has better wins but it has most teams where you would expect them. I mainly use it to rank borderline top 25 teams and find the 'vs 50' column convenient to see how many teams a team has played with a pulse.I’m not sure I have a legitimate answer on the FEI.
BUT, I can tell you what I don’t like about the rankings in the link.
1. Nevada has wins over Purdue and San Diego State and they’re ranked behind 1-9 South Alabama who has a win over Jackson State
2. Louisiana Lafayette is 0-2 against top 50 teams and ranked ahead of Appalachian State who is 2-0 against top 50 with a head to head win over Louisiana Lafayette
3. I just feel like these rankings are not legitimate enough to be used when considering what’s a top 50 win and what isn’t. Unc is a top 50 win, but UVA isn’t.
Yeah, that's what style points would do for yaDamn. Got some real #ucffacts on that one
I can't get behind any set of rankings that has a 4-7 Ole Miss team ranked as a top 50 team when their only FBS wins are 2-8 Vandy, 2-8 Arkansas, and 1-9 New Mexico State, while having a 6-4 Illinois team, with a huge ranked win over #12 Wisconsin outside of the top 60. There is clearly a flaw there.I get ya, it's not a resume rankings. Its main purpose to rate offensive and defensive efficiency and adjust for SOS in a way. It's similar to SP+ except that's now behind ESPN+ paywall . Maybe it's not best at determining who has better wins but it has most teams where you would expect them. I mainly use it to rank borderline top 25 teams and find the 'vs 50' column convenient to see how many teams a team has played with a pulse.
FairMiss St is 49
No one else is above 71 that i see . Im using Massey though as it averages all the polls
25. TAMU