Back to the topic.
Seattle wins this game.
Just did some more analysis regarding this game and no matter how I compute the data does Seattle win.
Trust me, if you like to make money........bet the farm on the Broncos.
Says the guy with 200 in V-Cash. Trust me.
Yeah, I have less V-Cash, but I'm not saying, Trust Me if you want to make money.
Sorry, but the only proof we can see regarding your betting acumen is your vcash account. Looking at what you started with vs what you have now has me thinking you believe your own story but your results prove otherwise.V-cash is for playing basketball. I use real money when playing Bowl games and NFL. Bowl season I was 11-3 and so far this playoff season, I am 4-0 against the spread on the games I picked to wager on. How you like them apples?![]()
V-cash is for playing basketball. I use real money when playing Bowl games and NFL. Bowl season I was 11-3 and so far this playoff season, I am 4-0 against the spread on the games I picked to wager on. How you like them apples?![]()
I have never said one word about Denver running the ball? Not sure what you are talking about? So no, I don't see what you are getting at.
See the SEA vs NO game from week 13, Wilson was the leading rusher of the game and threw for 310 yards and 3 TDs against a better defense than Denver has.
I wouldn't doubt if Wilson was Seattles leading rusher. However if Wilson has over 300 yds passing it is because they got way behind. I would guarantee if Wilson has to throw for over 300 yds the Hawks lose.
Honestly the only way I see the hawks having a good chance of winning is if there is high winds on the day of the superbowl. Think the high winds is what saved the Hawks against the Saints in the playoffs honestly.
310 equaled 34-7 against NO.
High winds kept NO in the game, without those winds, Seattle would have blown out the Saints again. Wind would hurt DEN more than SEA in the SB, that is for sure.
Seattle wins because the Denver defense sucks.
In the post season, they haven't been. That's what you're ignoring. They stopped Tom Brady AND Phillip Rivers. BOTH of them are better QB's than Russell.
I'll give ya Tom Brady (for now), buthas Rivers ever done? C'mon, Rivers, tell me how he is even in the discussion.
High Draft Pick?
All those Playoff Teams?
Team Leader, mkay!
Playoff Victories?
Number of years in the league?
Excelling at being a prick?
Take your pick, RW > Rivers. Period.
I'll give ya Tom Brady (for now), buthas Rivers ever done? C'mon, Rivers, tell me how he is even in the discussion.
High Draft Pick?
All those Playoff Teams?
Team Leader, mkay!
Playoff Victories?
Number of years in the league?
Excelling at being a prick?
Take your pick, RW > Rivers. Period.
You realize rivers had the 4th highest quarterback rating with two of those guys ahead of him only part time starters. So essentially manning is the only one with a higher quarterback rating this season.
And Rivers backed into the playoffs, while RW just won the NFC.
Isn't really accurate to say that SD "backed into the playoffs". They had to win their last four games of the season and five of their last six in order to get in.
And if not for the refs fuck up, Pittsburgh would have and should have been in.
And Rivers backed into the playoffs, while RW just won the NFC.