- Thread starter
- #1
- 171,930
- 53,182
- 1,033
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2014
- Location
- Still stuck here in Nashville
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 401,515.02
What really is the big difference? Players on grass get jacked up too
Yeah, but RG3’s reckless style told me that was going to happen to eventually on any surface.Natural grass is a better material if it is maintained. Anyone remember RG3 getting his knee wrecked?
During the Patriots’ dynasty years, Bob Kraft spent a lot to provide the best grass field he could.I would be for all grass throughout the NFL, but I doubt it will cut back on injuries very much.
Horrible burns from the old astroturf too. I hated it.Hated playing on turf in High School. I wouldn't call it concrete, but the hardness definitely made it unfavorable. You were always twice as sore the next day.
I would be for all grass throughout the NFL, but I doubt it will cut back on injuries very much.
It's not good to go back and forth between the two either because of the difference in cushion. Bad for the ligaments. The lower on the body the worse it is. These turf companies push their bullshit data for their bullshit product.Two weeks in a row the Packers have had guys get hurt on turf surfaces.
Two weeks in a row before that, the Packers had guys get hurt on grass.
Starting to think this football game they’re playing may be dangerous.