27mtrcougar
Well-Known Member
and if Bradford really goes through 2 grueling Knee rehabs to come back when he has 50m sitting in his bank.. do you really want to question his passion for the game?
and if Bradford really goes through 2 grueling Knee rehabs to come back when he has 50m sitting in his bank.. do you really want to question his passion for the game?
I think its funny when we get all the stupid penalties and all the drop passes when Bradford's in there you guys seem to forget or put the blame on him some how? not to mention the lack of talent he has had on both sides of the ball up until now. Amendola? is he suppose to be an elite WR? yeah I wouldn't mind him showing more emotion but the reality is that doesn't mean anything. there have been plenty of great QB's that have that demeanor. why do i think Bradfords better? I've been to many of the training camps, it isn't even close on the accuracy and velocity on the throws. again Davis was cut. he would get happy feet and panic and make bad throws. I don't think Davis is bad i don't have a problem with him being a back up, but no way the Rams are thinking he's the future. Before Bradford got hurt this year his arm strength from the rehab was stronger then ever. I agree the only question with sam is if he can stay healthy, but i think they will take that chance because he can make any throw on the field and thats hard to find. Do I think he's an elite Qb… no but he is above avg and won't lose you games.
Yes I would!! Davis has played well in the 8 games he has played, he had two bad games, sorry! I don't know what Davis is capable of, it's 6 pretty decent games, two bad games, that's a pretty small sampling.
I already know what we have in Bradford, a guy that has played for 4 years and has never done anything, on top of being hurt, do I want to go into next season counting on an injury prone, fragile QB, Hell no!
They both have the same winning %, their TD to Int are about the same.
Davis's completion % is 63.4% to Bradfords 58.6% , that's a big difference considering Bradford dinked and dunked most of his 4 years, and also had Amendola for 3 of those years, not to mention Lloyd for one, both better receivers than Davis has ever thrown to. Bradford in 4 years NEVER topped 61%
QB rating, Davis 85.1, Bradford 79.3
Davis shows emotion, Bradford acts like he could care less.
So please tell me where Bradford is any better than Davis, oh that's right he has made more money than Davis ever will in his lifetime!
I think its funny when we get all the stupid penalties and all the drop passes when Bradford's in there you guys seem to forget or put the blame on him some how? not to mention the lack of talent he has had on both sides of the ball up until now. Amendola? is he suppose to be an elite WR? yeah I wouldn't mind him showing more emotion but the reality is that doesn't mean anything. there have been plenty of great QB's that have that demeanor. why do i think Bradfords better? I've been to many of the training camps, it isn't even close on the accuracy and velocity on the throws. again Davis was cut. he would get happy feet and panic and make bad throws. I don't think Davis is bad i don't have a problem with him being a back up, but no way the Rams are thinking he's the future. Before Bradford got hurt this year his arm strength from the rehab was stronger then ever. I agree the only question with sam is if he can stay healthy, but i think they will take that chance because he can make any throw on the field and thats hard to find. Do I think he's an elite Qb… no but he is above avg and won't lose you games.
My only statement was going to be that this is a moot point. Neither Davis nor Hill will be starting next year and you can bank on that.
Then I read the bold print.
The lynch pin of your argument for Davis over Hill is that Hill had more to work with... but then you completely throw your own argument out the window by comparing Davis' numbers to Bradford's. Seriously??? Dude... you gotta make up your mind. Lol. It's either the team, or it's the QB.
The personnel Davis is playing with is light years ahead of what Bradford had to work with his entire career. You're right about one thing... Amendola and Lloyd were the best two targets Bradford ever had. But that's because Amendola was the only legit WR that Bradford ever had (or could catch a football, for that matter). If you really think Amendola/Gibson was a better combo than Quick/Britt... then I gotta question your sanity. Lol. Oh... and Brandon Lloyd... he and Bradford played together only 3 full
games. Lol. Bradford has never ever played with a bona-fide #1 WR. Davis had two of them on the field at the same time.
You really want to compare numbers? how about using the most comparable team to what Davis is playing with today. Last year, with worse receivers, Bradford completed 60% of his passes, for 1687 yards with 14 TDs and 4 INTs in 7 games. Davis has posted 63%, 2001 yards 12 TDs and 9 INTs.
So, basically, your argument is that Davis put up marginally better career numbers than Bradford, with far and away better offensive talent. Wow.
Go ahead and question Bradford's durability. No argument there. But, talent-wise... Bradford is head and shoulders ahead of Davis. To say otherwise is just plain insanity and your own argument proves it.
My only statement was going to be that this is a moot point. Neither Davis nor Hill will be starting next year and you can bank on that.
Then I read the bold print.
The lynch pin of your argument for Davis over Hill is that Hill had more to work with... but then you completely throw your own argument out the window by comparing Davis' numbers to Bradford's. Seriously??? Dude... you gotta make up your mind. Lol. It's either the team, or it's the QB.
The personnel Davis is playing with is light years ahead of what Bradford had to work with his entire career. You're right about one thing... Amendola and Lloyd were the best two targets Bradford ever had. But that's because Amendola was the only legit WR that Bradford ever had (or could catch a football, for that matter). If you really think Amendola/Gibson was a better combo than Quick/Britt... then I gotta
question your sanity. Lol. Oh... and Brandon Lloyd... he and Bradford played together only 3 full games. Lol. Bradford has never ever played with a bona-fide #1 WR. Davis had two of them on the field at the same time.
You really want to compare numbers? how about using the most comparable team to what Davis is playing with today. Last year, with worse receivers, Bradford completed 60% of his passes, for 1687 yards with 14 TDs and 4 INTs in 7 games. Davis has posted 63%, 2001 yards 12 TDs and 9 INTs.
So, basically, your argument is that Davis put up marginally better career numbers than Bradford, with far and away better offensive talent. Wow.
Go ahead and question Bradford's durability. No argument there. But, talent-wise... Bradford is head and shoulders ahead of Davis. To say otherwise is just plain insanity and your own argument proves it.
Cougar
You can't use the " he was cut by the Rams " excuse as to why he isn't a good QB or why he can't be a QB for the future.
Warner was cut and banished to arena football and NFL Europe before the Rams signed him to be, what was it again?, oh yeah, 3rd string QB behind Tony Freaking Banks. That goes to show just how much all these NFL coaches and scouts know.
The point Smed and Zeke are trying to make is that there is no way the Rams can know what they have in Davis after just 8 games and him riding the bench behind Over The Hill journeyman QB who is obviously not part of the future at 34 years old.
And because of that they will be using a high draft pick on a QB that may not need to be used had they rode Davis through the season to see what he's really made of.
Hell, Brady looked like a game manager QB after his first 8 games in the NFL. They leaned on the defense to win games and told him to just manage the game. Too bad Belicheat isn't so quick to bench a young QB or they never would've discovered they had a Hall of Fame QB after all.
Heck, he even chose a young Brady over a healthy veteran in Bledsoe ( who finished and won the AFC Championship game ) to start in the Super
I don't think Davis is a bad quarterback and if they wanted to start him over hill I really wouldn't have a problem with it. I just brought up the cut factor because I think it's crazy to start saying Davis has more talent and is a better QB than Bradford. They didn't cut Bradford they cut Davis. No way Davis is walking into Rams camp and beating out Bradford even with a bad knee lol. Your points about Brady and bleedsoe.. that's exactly what I think Branford is more than capable of doing what good talent around him. Manage the game. But has the Ability to make big plays and keep defenses honest.
I think its funny when we get all the stupid penalties and all the drop passes when Bradford's in there you guys seem to forget or put the blame on him some how? not to mention the lack of talent he has had on both sides of the ball up until now. Amendola? is he suppose to be an elite WR? yeah I wouldn't mind him showing more emotion but the reality is that doesn't mean anything. there have been plenty of great QB's that have that demeanor. why do i think Bradfords better? I've been to many of the training camps, it isn't even close on the accuracy and velocity on the throws. again Davis was cut. he would get happy feet and panic and make bad throws. I don't think Davis is bad i don't have a problem with him being a back up, but no way the Rams are thinking he's the future. Before Bradford got hurt this year his arm strength from the rehab was stronger then ever. I agree the only question with sam is if he can stay healthy, but i think they will take that chance because he can make any throw on the field and thats hard to find. Do I think he's an elite Qb… no but he is above avg and won't lose you games.
I've been to many of the training camps, it isn't even close on the accuracy and velocity on the throws.
Hey brother Zeke! Hows the weather? I'm not ready to totally give up on Davis or Hill but I don't see either one as the future for the Rams. The Rams are coaching along a great young group of wide receivers, tight ends and backs. They have a few potential pro bowlers in that group. I'd like to see the Rams try and do better at the QB position. In fact it needs to be their top priority in the off season no matter what they do with Hill or Davis. just sayin...
^^ Thats funny right there ^^
I bet he looks real good in practice, its just a dam shame he cant do that against a real defense when it really matters!
Can you say.....Dink and Dunk??
and if Bradford really goes through 2 grueling Knee rehabs to come back when he has 50m sitting in his bank.. do you really want to question his passion for the game?
I'm sorry but that ^^ makes NO sense whatsoever!
Well you seem to think he has no fire or passion and doesn't care about winning? He could've retired after the knee injury.. he has 50 million in the bank he doesn't need to play.
Sure, he made mistakes, but so did a lot of others players. He didn't get any help when it counted! Some of those mistakes wernt his fault, but he is the qb that takes the blame. TOo bad you guys are just too naïve to realize it!
So lets cut Bradford, officially declare him a BUST! Lets start over, draft a new qb, Im thinkin 2nd or 3rd round, re-sign Davis, then sign a free agent qb. Lets create a healthy competition at qb. You heard it here first brother Bunc! What do you think??
Well you seem to think he has no fire or passion and doesn't care about
winning? He could've retired after the knee injury.. he has 50 million in the
bank he doesn't need to play.