MW49ers5
New Member
if he had cushion i believe so....... but tight, he'll eventually lose him if Brees has all day...
but def will tackle him n not miss.
That sounds right...
if he had cushion i believe so....... but tight, he'll eventually lose him if Brees has all day...
but def will tackle him n not miss.
Wow.....not even touched. Hey but they stopped them in the first quarter and with the help of half time held them to 3 in the 2nd.
More like thisAll of the RB's are having a lot of room. The Saints line is holding right now.
Of course forcing a punt is a GREAT strategy, but it's hardly viable.
And those stops happened. Detroit didn't score off them. That's not the defense's fault.
But to imply they don't matter. . . since they haven't gotten stops lately, aren't those stops very important? I'd rather be down 3 than 17.
Look dude....I've been traveling all week so I'm not in the mood to debate. I know it's your passion in life, but it's not mine.
Per the definition (having a reasonable chance of succeeding), stopping a team from getting a first down is a viable strategy but it's not always successful. It's more probable to stop a team than force a turnover, in my opinion.
The point about "lately" relates to the fact you can't rely on turnovers. You have to stop your opponent other ways. It's great they got turnovers, but they haven't stopped them any other way....hell they've dropped at least two other ints so they can't even rely on that at this point.
The only thing I blame Detroit's D for is missing tackles, dropping INTs, and giving Brees all day to throw.
So I can avoid another reply. You're right, you're always right.