poewelch84
Well-Known Member
And still play a tougher schedule than 80% of college football.
I didn't say they didn't but if you are going to open your mouth about non conference opponents that shouldn't be your mom conference schedule.
And still play a tougher schedule than 80% of college football.
Agreed. Alabama should have to play the conference champion of each P5 conference the next year.
Well you do understand Nick Saban doesn't make the SEC scheduling rules, right? He's also bitched about non-conference scheduling beyond the current season. You're acting like it's just some kind of front. You're also acting like Bama's schedule is some kind of a joke. They play few cupcakes but that conference schedule in brutal. I'd also challenge you to find me another team that has a run comparable to Bama's LSU thru Chokelahoma streak.No one has a conference we're all fans unless you play for Colorado football. The point is Saban saying everyone should only play Power Five non conference with that as his mom conference slate is laughable. Through Notre Dame's season they played as many power give opponents as Saban's Alabama. Also you're team went 5-7 sit down bitch.
I didn't say they didn't but if you are going to open your mouth about non conference opponents that shouldn't be your mom conference schedule.
Damn dude. You seem to have some kind of an axe to grind with the SEC and Nick Saban. It's not their fault Brian Kelly is a red-faced asshole that can't figure out how to prepare his teams for games that have actual championship implications.No but Saban should keep his mouth closed playing the likes of the Citadel.
I didn't say they didn't but if you are going to open your mouth about non conference opponents that shouldn't be your mom conference schedule.
Alabama coach Nick Saban said he still isn't quite sure how the committee determines the top four teams.
"I don't honestly know all the things the Selection Committee does to make the decision," he said. "I just assumed that they -- from several different resources, look at the total body of work that a particular team does relative to strength of schedule and those types of things.
"But we're not on a level playing field now, all right. I mean, if you play a championship game -- I mean, we played a top-4 team in the championship game, so we actually played an eight-team playoff this year for our team. Some teams didn't have to do that."
Saban said he's talked "to no avail" about how all Power 5 schools should only play Power 5 opponents, but that "nobody is supportive of what I believe."
"Then I think you would be able to evaluate who has the best teams a little bit better because we all wouldn't have three or four games a year that were sort of not significant in terms of how you would evaluate," he said. "It's hard to qualify is this league better than that league, how many good teams do they have in that league. Those things are difficult. But if we all played each other more, I think it would help that."
CFP's Hancock doesn't see field expanding
He is arguing what you want and he has a powerful voice that people will actually listen to. What part of this is bad for you?No but Saban should keep his mouth closed playing the likes of the Citadel.
Saban isn’t stupid enough to bind Alabama to rules that other schools aren’t.I didn't say they didn't but if you are going to open your mouth about non conference opponents that shouldn't be your mom conference schedule.
I thought it was stupid when the Big Xii implemented it, but I have changed my mind. It makes the Big Xii race more interesting down the stretch, I love the way the Big Xii definitely ends up with the top 2 teams playing, and I think OU got in the Playoffs this year because of the game. Otherwise, I think Georgia (11-2) OR Ohio State (12-1) would have been chosen over 11-1 OU (without a Conference Championship Game). So, the Big Xii made a good decision, and I am fan enough to admit I was wrong in my initial opposition.Yeah it all factors in I guess. That part could be cyclical though. I thought the big 12 messed up adding the championship game but always playing the 2nd highest team in the conference does help.
Don't worry! Iowa State plans on crashing that party from time to time to help alleviate your angst.I hate it. Oklahoma and Texas are going to meet up in that game a lot. Beating your most hated rival is hard. Doing it twice in the same season is really hard. That game should be played once per season.
I would agree it can make the race more interesting down the stretch. It dang sure did this year.I thought it was stupid when the Big Xii implemented it, but I have changed my mind. It makes the Big Xii race more interesting down the stretch, I love the way the Big Xii definitely ends up with the top 2 teams playing, and I think OU got in the Playoffs this year because of the game. Otherwise, I think Georgia (11-2) OR Ohio State (12-1) would have been chosen over 11-1 OU (without a Conference Championship Game). So, the Big Xii made a good decision, and I am fan enough to admit I was wrong in my initial opposition.
No but Saban should keep his mouth closed playing the likes of the Citadel.
I would agree it can make the race more interesting down the stretch. It dang sure did this year.
I would also agree that if a conference is going to have a playoff, the Big 12 is the only one doing it correctly.
I would also agree it is probably the reason OU got into the CFP this year...but it shouldn't have IMO. (Not playing in their CCG is also the reason tOSU and Bama did get in the previous two years but that's another discussion.) OU should or should not have gotten in on their 11-1 record alone. They shouldn't get/need a mulligan to get in. I despised Bama getting a mulligan with LSU back in '12.
I'm a golfer. I don't believe in mulligans. And if they've already played once and settled it on the field, why should the loser be rewarded with another shot at 'em. Did Texas get a do over with West Virginia? Did West Virginia get a do over with Okie Lite? Did your clones get a do over with TCU?
Again, just my opinion.
Or even Oklahoma playing Texas. Or more to the point, Norte Dame sitting on their ass eating popcorn.
He is arguing what you want and he has a powerful voice that people will actually listen to. What part of this is bad for you?
Seriousily use your brain you WANT him to talk on this.
He isn't going to put his team at a disadvantage just to prove a point. He is for changing the rule but he isn't going to enforce it on himself until everyone does.
Exactly. Unfortunately too many just fon’t get this.
Also, I'm in agreement with Saban. What the fuck is the playoff committee's criteria? TCU was left out of the '14 playoff b/c the Big 12 was told they needed a CCG. Bama, tOSU and ND have proven how worthless CCG's are after receiving a playoff spot when neither team won their division and played for the CCG. So yeah, I agree with what Saban is saying here.....