- Thread starter
- #41
Rock Strongo
My mind spits with an enormous kickback.
im kicking ass.
i ask that all the time. why do it if youre awesome without the help?So now 30 minutes of football is all we need to determine whether something helped or hurt a team? So if we only take a half of football then about half the players in the league should be HOF players by the numbers they put up in that one half of football.
As for the topic at hand. What is the point of this topic? I don't think you are going to find a single person on here that is going to say beating someone's wife is a good thing. We all know it is terrible and I am proud of the Bears for cutting him and I hope every team in the league sets the precedent that this will not be tolerated and he doesn't find work. We shall see what happens with that. Having said that his actions off the field don't actually affect the game in general. It is an isolated incident. Now breaking the actual rules of the game affects the integrity of the entire game for every team especially when they were caught in the 2nd biggest game of the year.
Now you can say that the deflated footballs didn't help them and even by your words essentially it hurt them but then why do it? Why in the world break the rules if all it is going to do is create a disadvantage? It makes no sense if you are trying to compete for a Super Bowl to then put your team at a loss even before the game begins.
im kicking ass.
dirt will get it.Haha this has to win for funniest tweet of the day!
i ask that all the time. why do it if youre awesome without the help?
psychological thing?
who knows?
uno?
no, i didnt say that. what does the teams markedly better play in the 2nd half with ref approved balls (worse in the first with under inflated) have to do with the pats beating baltimore?
who said it was a disadvantage?Again though if it actually ends up being a disadvantage for the team they would never do it. This is actually using Logic...I know that is not the easiest concept for you to understand but these are professionals at the very top at what they do and you are telling me that they would purposefully put themselves at a disadvantage by deflating footballs knowing that if they were properly inflated that they would actually do better on the field? That makes 0 sense.
who said it was a disadvantage?
i didnt. i just said for 30 mins they played better with ref approved balls.
they obviously did it for a reason like rodgers does for his large hands.
who said they didnt?So then you are saying that they purposefully broke the rules to try and get an advantage...Good glad we are on the same page then.
who said they didnt?
i dont think anyone has. certainly not me.
PS the "so you are saying" is the weakest thing on the internet today.
no, im not saying. i said what i said. quote that only.
uno?
no, i didnt say that. what does the teams markedly better play in the 2nd half with ref approved balls (worse in the first with under inflated) have to do with the pats beating baltimore?
im not embarrassed. i am for you guys, not for me.Because during your 2 week embarassment here, you've continue to ignore their win over the Ravens in which they cheated
i think you misunderstand.Jesus Rock....wtf?
Every time you create a thread like this, you are effectively trolling yourself (which is obviously your goal).lets be honest...PSI is far more important of an NFL and social issue than idiots like this.
zoiks scoob.Every time you create a thread like this, you are effectively trolling yourself (which is obviously your goal).
Did I nail that one or what?zoiks scoob.