DT LUNA
Vietnam Veteran
I'm fine with Leclerc and ScherzerJon Morosi getting on board today with the Rangers possibly being sellers. He mentioned:
Yates
Leclerc
Scherzer
Eovaldi
Heaney
Lorenzen
I'm fine with Leclerc and ScherzerJon Morosi getting on board today with the Rangers possibly being sellers. He mentioned:
Yates
Leclerc
Scherzer
Eovaldi
Heaney
Lorenzen
I am fine with any of them because they are all gone at the end of the year anyway. Might as well get something for them and then try to sign them in the offseason if we still need them.I'm fine with Leclerc and Scherzer
Why not try and extend those we want to keep. Hate to think we let Yates and Eovoldi go because no guarantee we can resign after their contract is up.I am fine with any of them because they are all gone at the end of the year anyway. Might as well get something for them and then try to sign them in the offseason if we still need them.
I wouldn't mind that, but in the offseason.I would like to work out a 2 or 3 year deal with Eovaldi. I'm ok with all the other guys leaving.
When one of them is not in the OF they can DH. We need to keep Langford, Carter, Hill and Yes, Garcia in the lineup to get them going. No one else needs to be DHing if all four of those are healthy.I believe it wil be Langford LF, Carter CF, Hill or Garcia RF. Taversa and Ski traded or dfa'd.
I was thinking after Scherzer's last start that we need to trade him pronto before he lands back on the DL.Jon Morosi getting on board today with the Rangers possibly being sellers. He mentioned:
Yates
Leclerc
Scherzer
Eovaldi
Heaney
Lorenzen
Good idea but it seems to rarely work out that way.I am fine with any of them because they are all gone at the end of the year anyway. Might as well get something for them and then try to sign them in the offseason if we still need them.
We have just as much chance to sign them in the offseason, just like we had lots of opportunity to sign Montgomery and Garver last offseason. The only reason we didn't sign those two was a lack of money. Most players want to hit free agency. That is why we have signed very few guys during the season over the last several years.Why not try and extend those we want to keep. Hate to think we let Yates and Eovoldi go because no guarantee we can resign after their contract is up.
I agree. I mean asap.I was thinking after Scherzer's last start that we need to trade him pronto before he lands back on the DL.
The only problem with him is he has that no trade clause. He had to agree to come here. It could still happen, though.I was thinking after Scherzer's last start that we need to trade him pronto before he lands back on the DL.
Yeah, I addressed that above. I think it would have a great chance with us, or at least a lot better than usual.Good idea but it seems to rarely work out that way.
Yates and Eovaldi have been extremly valuable to winning a WS. Remember how badly we were begging for a closer? Personaly I would make every effort possible to resign both. All others can go. Bird in the hand is still not a bad thing. Not trying to debate but imo these rwo guys are too valuable to risk losing if not necessary.I am fine with any of them because they are all gone at the end of the year anyway. Might as well get something for them and then try to sign them in the offseason if we still need them.
We can hold onto them and still lose them. We can let them so and still sign them. To me the two decisions are separate from each other.Yates and Eovaldi have been extremly valuable to winning a WS. Remember how badly we were begging for a closer? Personaly I would make every effort possible to resign both. All others can go. Bird in the hand is still not a bad thing. Not trying to debate but imo these rwo guys are too valuable to risk losing if not necessary.
It is probably less than 2%.The percentage that resign after being traded at the break I’m betting is low.