- Thread starter
- #681
saddles
No More "Bullpen Failure"
Jung was 2 for 4 with a double.
I agree that we do not want to gut the farm because we did that a few years ago and it has taken a while to build it back up. But we do have some trade pieces down on the farm that have nowhere to go.if they want to compete in any sense of the word, there will have to be significant upgrades on both sides of the ball. I don't want them gutting the farm to do that.
i understand but i don't think he is worth $6M for the 2 years and would pass on the option and maybe look to re-sign him. i would rather see the Rangers go after a couple of FA bullpen pieces including a quality closerFrom our history - granted, is is not so much granted going forward - we take chances on arms.........I can't honestly answer re: Leclerc's value. But my gut would say yes to next year and then let the results determine his future.
Perez and Moore plus at least 2 really good bullpen pieces would satisfy me along with Jung and Huff added to the positional rosterhe said he doesn't see the Rangers spending half a billion again. Given that no other team ever has done that before, not a shock that we wouldn't do it again.
i know most on here don't want Garver back based on last year but i think neither he, the Twins and the Rangers realized the issue with his arm until after the season started. once they did the Rangers didn't push for him to have surgery hard enough even after the long stint on the DL. he and the Rangers believed that he could continue to hit. which it turned out was wrong.I wouldn't count anything out. I have faith that CY will do what he can to upgrade the team. Davis went on record saying the plan is to complete next year. Personally speaking, it will take a LOT more than Garver to accomplish that.
meant Garver not Huff but if we end up giving up on Garver then HuffPerez and Moore plus at least 2 really good bullpen pieces would satisfy me along with Jung and Huff added to the positional roster