Oh... thank you. I didn't realize that. And since I have never in my life seen an underdog win, we shouldn't expand the playoff system. Hell, we don't even need to play the game anymore. We can get the preseason poll from the AP and simply declare whoever they vote #1 as the national champ that year.
That is why you play the game numb nuts. That is why the 07 Boise/OU game is considered great, it wasn't some form of outstanding football that you never see, it was a cinderella story where no one thought that they had a chance. This reeks of worry as if Bama were to lose to a good G5 school would implode your mind. Just so you know, it wouldn't be the first time.
I love how you are quick to cite a tougher schedule for power 5 schools, but refuse to acknowledge that most of these G5 schools have lesser talent than P5 schools and yet often times still play P5 opponents. This is why it is typically more impressive for G5 teams to go undefeated. SOS is a pretty unstable metric. A preseason SOS ranking is BS as no one has played and thus no one knows how tough any of the teams are. I mean hell, S+P has BYU listed as the 29th toughest schedule this year. The only teams of note that they have played are Wisconsin and Washington (both teams that have underperformed this year) and the only team they have of note remaining is currently #23 Utah.
Next.
So there is no good reason to have an 8 team system? None, you can't think of ANY value that would bring? None? Don't confuse or conflat my statements. I have been advocating for an 8 team playoff system. I merely asked SteelerPride for his reason of why it's bogus when the FCS can do even more. I do think a 16 team system would be the most fan friendly system (which does matter!!), but 8 team would satisfy the overall consensus in my opinion. So you not only think there is no value brought it, but that it essentially devalues the regular season?
I can agree that there are too many bowl games.
LMAO. That's funny. Read up? I assume you are saying this because you are "read up" (LMAO), but yet through this whole post, you provided ZERO substance to refute a playoff expansion. You're a bum. You provided the EXACT SAME dipshit argument that was already refuted...' well it isn't basketball' so what you moron. Suddenly for the playoff system to go beyond 4 teams it means it suddenly becomes basketball. Have you ever debated in your life? You sir, are an idiot. Or 'what is the #24 team really going to do?'... they are like any other team, they will do what they can. Have you ever seen an upset in college football? I rest my case, again, your statements are the digital expression of dumbassery coming through on my computer.
Well what do I have to do to be worth the time to have a REAL explanation because yours are nonsensical, logically flawed drivel.
My god, you whine like a liberal snowflake. For starters, as I have said repeatedly, your arguments are literally dumb, flawed, and lack ANY substance that could be taken as a form of credible information. Based on that... are you sure you are not some dipshit liberal, what's next, wanna tell me the gender pay gap is real? 2, you reach on a 'participation trophy' statement, while completely whiffing on YOUR OWN LOGIC. You are the one that is afraid to play teams or afraid to lose to them. You want a system set up to ensure that doesn't happen. You want a system that sets up to maximize your teams potential at winning a championship... more games doesn't do that. You want these things, because you know that expanding the playoff will make it harder for Bama, nevermind the fact that you always complain about other people complaining about Bamas scheduling... I am not contending that any one gets any kind of trophy, hell I am not advocating for a 24 team playoff, but you sir are the living embodiment of participation trophy.
So I take it that your opinion is to go back to the BCS days and continue doing things in that manner?
I suggest that because your logic is flawed if you still want the playoff system, because you can LITERALLY say what you just did about ANY kind of playoff system.
Have they?
For me it's Ohio State by far. I very much want Georgia in it and I very much don't want Ohio State in it. Everything else in-between is just slight preferences for me.
It would be brutal. But Michigan has only played Texas once and never played LSU. From that standpoint, it would be pretty damn interesting. How we haven't met LSU in a bowl is beyond me with as many SEC/B10 bowls as we have. We always get god damn florida and blow them out.
