- Thread starter
- #181
You had a dinosaur in the last year? Damn, I’m jealous.
Why Washington will return to the PlayoffI will tip my cap to Washington if they make it thru the gauntlet of elite teams on their schedule. They have already beaten a who’s who of CFB this year. And they still have to face...........well, they have more games. We will just leave it at that, so we don’t offend the PAC faithful.
You'll also watch Michigan in a bowl game no one really cares about, again.I will tip my cap to Washington if they make it thru the gauntlet of elite teams on their schedule. They have already beaten a who’s who of CFB this year. And they still have to face...........well, they have more games. We will just leave it at that, so we don’t offend the PAC faithful.
You'll also watch Michigan in a bowl game no one really cares about, again.
USC Trojans, Washington Huskies appear to be the teams to beat in the Pac-12 football raceWe aren’t blessed to play schedules sponsored by Charmin. Just be thankful you don’t have to play USC again.
I have to say. One way not to lose 6 games every year is to play schedules like UW has last year and this year.
These stats bring up a couple interesting questions. Do you consider a defensive TD an offensive TD? Or a special teams TD an offensive TD?cfbstats.com - 2017 National Team Leaders <---- Offense
cfbstats.com - 2017 National Team Leaders <----- Defense
Speaking of special teams ...These stats bring up a couple interesting questions. Do you consider a defensive TD an offensive TD? Or a special teams TD an offensive TD?
I knew Pettis has been money on special teams. And y'all had a couple defensive TD's. They have Washington listed as having 30 TD's on offense on both the site you linked and the official NCAA site. I love stats but am of the school Offense, defense and special teams are separate. I've got 25 TD's with Washingtons offense on the field. 3 TDs contributed by Pettis on special teams. And 2 TD's scored by the Washington defense. That makes up the total of 30. I'm actually curious how it may look. If we adjusted the top 15 by this standard. May change the entire complexion for a few teams.
If Washington St. can beat SC, then so can Washington. SC beat UW in Seattle last season and the Huskies beat the Trojans in LA the year before.Only way UW wins the PAC is if someone knocks USC from the title game. USC has too many athletes for UW to contend with. Same results as last year will happen. Maybe not the exactly the same, I think UW can top 17 yards rushing this year if they play......maybe.
USC has a ton of injuries. In all honesty unless SC can win a game or too. In a manner that gets some players some rest. And they get some players back on the field. Winning the south is going to be a massive challenge.Only way UW wins the PAC is if someone knocks USC from the title game. USC has too many athletes for UW to contend with. Same results as last year will happen. Maybe not the exactly the same, I think UW can top 17 yards rushing this year if they play......maybe.
Nobody in the PAC South has a chance against SC imo other than Utah and the Trojans have them at home this year.USC has a ton of injuries. In all honesty unless SC can win a game or too. In a manner that gets some players some rest. And they get some players back on the field. Winning the south is going to be a massive challenge.
At this point it's going to be a difficult path for SC to make the CCG. Should they get healthy and manage to sneak in. Could be a great gameIf Washington St. can beat SC, then so can Washington. SC beat UW in Seattle last season and the Huskies beat the Trojans in LA the year before.
Other than the Utes, who in the PAC South has a legit shot at SC?At this point it's going to be a difficult path for SC to make the CCG. Should they get healthy and manage to sneak in. Could be a great game
SC's roster is pretty depleted. Bebe is expected back by ND if all goes well.Their roster is pretty thin. I wouldn't count anyone out in the south tbhOther than the Utes, who in the PAC South has a legit shot at SC?
Other than the Utes, who in the PAC South has a legit shot at SC?
That's a boatload of injuries but even now I don't see anyone in the PAC South having a legit shot at winning that division other than SC and Utah.They added Talamaivao to the out for the season list after the Wazzu game.The only thing missing is that Sarah McLachlan song
- Out for season: K Michael Brown (knee), CB Greg Johnson (shoulder), LB Tayler Katoa (knee), CB Jonathan Lockett (hip), S Isaiah Pola-Mao (shoulder), OL Viane Talamaivao (pectoral)
- Out: OLB Hunter Echols (hip), TE Daniel Imatorbhebhe (hip), OT Nathan Smith (knee)
- Questionable: RB Stephen Carr (foot), DL Malik Dorton (knee). OL Chuma Edoga (ankle), DL Rasheem Green (ankle), WR Jalen Greene (concussion), OLB Porter Gustin (toe/bicep), LB Jordan Iosefa (concussion), DL Marlon Tuipulotu (knee)
- Probable: WR Deontay Burnett (shoulder), CB Jamel Cook (illness), DL Josh Fatu (knee), LT Toa Lobendahn (infection), WR Steven Mitchell (groin)