HizzleRocker
New Member
No, they act on the "charges". They act on a warrant. A judge is not going to issue a warrant where there are no charges of breaking the law.
There are no charges or warrant. He could have been arrested on the spot, but wasn't. They didn't need a warrant to do such.
Your final sentence is stupid distraction.
Rule 4. Arrest Warrant or Summons on a Complaint | Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure | LII / Legal Information Institute
Per the Norman PD. He has not been "charged".
Every time you are opening your mouth on this topic you are making yourself look worse. I've begged you to stop.
You actually think that part (B) is talking about charges being filed? Lol. That section is talking about a "complaint" in request for a warrant. The "offense charged" simply means the offense he is accused of. If the judge buys the argument - the judge will sign the warrant for arrest. After arrest - the DA (not the police) decide whether or not to file charges.
The police cannot "charge" anybody with anything. They can make arrest decisions. That's it. The offense "charged" is legal speak, of which you obviously know nothing about.