politics thread

[gkekoa]

Sorry dude, but Bannon is a racist and fucking proud of it. He loves the us vs them shit.

WTOP | Steve Bannon: Wear label of ‘racist’ as a ‘badge of honor’


(WASHINGTON) — Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon on Saturday told a crowd of far-right French politicians to let people label them as “racist” and to consider it “a badge of honor.”

Bannon, a senior advisor to U.S. President Donald Trump, attended the party congress of France’s far-right National Front in the French city of Lille, where he also met with the political party’s leader, Marine Le Pen.

Clad in his usual field coat and khakis, Bannon stood onstage to address the seated crowd of party elites, who were dressed in suits.


“Let them call you racist. Let them call you xenophobes. Let them call you nativists,” he said. “Wear it as a badge of honor. Because every day, we get stronger and they get weaker.”


And this was our Presidents trusted advisor.

Again, no context when you post things.

So do you believe he said to wear it as a badge of honor because those words are true, or the more likely case where you win the debate against a liberal and they run out of intelligent retorts and reply with racist?

We both know the answer to my question. I have been called racist by people for listing facts in a discussion. Seldom are people smart enough to ask what I actually believe.

 

[gkekoa]

IN NO context is it ok to be proud of being called a racist.

That would be like me telling my football team (mostly black mind you) be proud of being called a hood negra, wear it as a badge of honor.

There is no context where that works.. ever.

Why? It simply means they have run out of intelligent things to say. If you know it isn’t true, and you don’t actually respect the other person, it is a sign of victory.

Do you know it isn’t true? The idiots that would call you that, do you really give a damn what they believe and furthermore, doesn’t it make them look stupid?

 

[Sharkinva]

Again, no context when you post things.

So do you believe he said to wear it as a badge of honor because those words are true, or the more likely case where you win the debate against a liberal and they run out of intelligent retorts and reply with racist?

We both know the answer to my question. I have been called racist by people for listing facts in a discussion. Seldom are people smart enough to ask what I actually believe.

I know the answer you want. When a man comes out and says be proud of being called a racist, kind of hard to context that away... Unless you are telling me you agree with him.

 

[gkekoa]

I know the answer you want. When a man comes out and says be proud of being called a racist, kind of hard to context that away... Unless you are telling me you agree with him.

I absolutely agree with him depending on who says it. If Mike Vick called me a racist, I would embrace it because I know he has no standing to believe it and I have no respect for him. If you call me a racist, it would hurt because you should know me better than that and it would hurt because I respect you.

 

[Sharkinva]

I absolutely agree with him depending on who says it. If Mike Vick called me a racist, I would embrace it because I know he has no standing to believe it and I have no respect for him. If you call me a racist, it would hurt because you should know me better than that and it would hurt because I respect you.

And thats the thing, I actually dont think you are a racist.. further more I dont think any one that posts on the Skins board is a racist. Not in the traditional sense of the word.

Now some of those guys on the politics forum.... Shit I think a few of them have monogrammed hoodies and swastika tats.

 

[gkekoa]

And thats the thing, I actually dont think you are a racist.. further more I dont think any one that posts on the Skins board is a racist. Not in the traditional sense of the word.

Now some of those guys on the politics forum.... Shit I think a few of them have monogrammed hoodies and swastika tats.

No doubt. I usually don’t respond to them unless it is to correct them. I definitely respond to some of the liberals, most of which I have no respect for, so I embrace their hatred when they end with calling me a racist. Oddly, there are some liberals I do respect. They don’t believe I even understand their POV, but I do. I just don’t agree with it. We can come to different opinions and both can be intelligent. It is how they are derived.

 

[Skins2021]

Well I will give you Kudos for going honest on this. But on the second part, there are plenty of high profile whites that hate people of color as well.

I do think the same can be said coming from the other direction. Maybe more so in entertainment then politics but high profile nonetheless. Jemele Hill immediately jumps out to me.

 

[skinsdad62]

IN NO context is it ok to be proud of being called a racist.

That would be like me telling my football team (mostly black mind you) be proud of being called a hood negra, wear it as a badge of honor.

There is no context where that works.. ever.

you are missing the point , if you are being called racist because you disagree with a liberal point of view that doesnt have to do anything with racism , then you are winning the debate because they resort to name calling . that is the "badge " he is talking about

 

[Sportster 72]

Still racism?

 

[skinsdad62]

Still racism?

ebb , care to comment ?

 

[skinsdad62]

According to the Texas Department of Public Safety, there have been over 171,000 illegal aliens charged with over 265,000 criminal offenses in the state of Texas since June 2011. This includes nearly 500 murder charges, 34,000 drug charges, and 3,100 sexual assault charges.

More backing for crime committed by illegals

 

[skinsdad62]

63000 American citizens killed by illegal aliens since 9/11. Everyone preventable .

 

[skinsdad62]

CNN, MSNBC cut away from Trump event with ‘Angel Families’

Some one mocked people who watch Fox News implying people who watched Fox were uninformed . This is what the MSM media did when the other side of the debate was presented . This is the news you herald as real news . How did the MSM. Cover the IG report ? They locked onto the first paragraph and pushed that narrative . No coverage of the hearings no reading of the reports , nothing ! If you read the IG report and watched the hearings you would know that narrative was false . You want to pass that off as how business is done but people have caught on to the BS and down playing George Soros won’t cut the mustard

 

[gkekoa]

CNN, MSNBC cut away from Trump event with ‘Angel Families’

Some one mocked people who watch Fox News implying people who watched Fox were uninformed . This is what the MSM media did when the other side of the debate was presented . This is the news you herald as real news . How did the MSM. Cover the IG report ? They locked onto the first paragraph and pushed that narrative . No coverage of the hearings no reading of the reports , nothing ! If you read the IG report and watched the hearings you would know that narrative was false . You want to pass that off as how business is done but people have caught on to the BS and down playing George Soros won’t cut the mustard

Yeah...so there was no political bias...but it was over an election...where they didn’t like the republican candidate...but no political bias?

 

[skinsdad62]

Now I wonder why this isnt pointed out ?

 

[Sharkinva]

Now I wonder why this isnt pointed out ?

Likely for the same reason that this isnt.


“Nearly half of all the unauthorized migrants now living in the United States entered the country legally through a port of entry such as an airport or a border crossing point where they were subject to inspection by immigration officials, according to new estimates from the Pew Hispanic Center. As much as 45% of the total unauthorized migrant population entered the country with visas that allowed them to visit or reside in the U.S. for a limited amount of time. Known as ‘overstayers’, these migrants became part of the unauthorized population when they remained in the country after their visas had expired.”

President Trump can believe whatever he wants. But he can’t invent his own set of facts. A wall would only give a false sense of security. So Trump will build it, mainly, for political reasons.

Immigration is, in essence, an economic and social problem of supply and demand. If you really want to solve this dilemma, you have to start by legalizing the undocumented population already here and implementing a multi-national system to make legal immigration easier, not more difficult. Nothing else will work.

Trump’s wall is totally useless. Any smart person would know that.

Jorge Ramos: Donald Trump's Wall Is Totally Useless

 

[gkekoa]

Likely for the same reason that this isnt.


“Nearly half of all the unauthorized migrants now living in the United States entered the country legally through a port of entry such as an airport or a border crossing point where they were subject to inspection by immigration officials, according to new estimates from the Pew Hispanic Center. As much as 45% of the total unauthorized migrant population entered the country with visas that allowed them to visit or reside in the U.S. for a limited amount of time. Known as ‘overstayers’, these migrants became part of the unauthorized population when they remained in the country after their visas had expired.”

President Trump can believe whatever he wants. But he can’t invent his own set of facts. A wall would only give a false sense of security. So Trump will build it, mainly, for political reasons.

Immigration is, in essence, an economic and social problem of supply and demand. If you really want to solve this dilemma, you have to start by legalizing the undocumented population already here and implementing a multi-national system to make legal immigration easier, not more difficult. Nothing else will work.

Trump’s wall is totally useless. Any smart person would know that.

Jorge Ramos: Donald Trump's Wall Is Totally Useless

We already did that with Reagan. We legalized the illegals with promises from democrats. Nothing transpired.

The wall isn’t useless. To think so spits in the face of common sense.

Who cares what Ramos believes?

 

[Sharkinva]

We already did that with Reagan. We legalized the illegals with promises from democrats. Nothing transpired.

The wall isn’t useless. To think so spits in the face of common sense.

Who cares what Ramos believes?

Ramos got his info from the PEW Research center.

The wall is a false sense of security. But i honestly wish they would just agree to build the damn thing already. Just so I can see what the next grand plan is to "secure" America.

 

[gkekoa]

Likely for the same reason that this isnt.


“Nearly half of all the unauthorized migrants now living in the United States entered the country legally through a port of entry such as an airport or a border crossing point where they were subject to inspection by immigration officials, according to new estimates from the Pew Hispanic Center. As much as 45% of the total unauthorized migrant population entered the country with visas that allowed them to visit or reside in the U.S. for a limited amount of time. Known as ‘overstayers’, these migrants became part of the unauthorized population when they remained in the country after their visas had expired.”

President Trump can believe whatever he wants. But he can’t invent his own set of facts. A wall would only give a false sense of security. So Trump will build it, mainly, for political reasons.

Immigration is, in essence, an economic and social problem of supply and demand. If you really want to solve this dilemma, you have to start by legalizing the undocumented population already here and implementing a multi-national system to make legal immigration easier, not more difficult. Nothing else will work.

Trump’s wall is totally useless. Any smart person would know that.

Jorge Ramos: Donald Trump's Wall Is Totally Useless

Totally useless? About half enter by whatever means. The other half entered how?

I have already shown you how to stop the issue.

 

[skinsdad62]

Likely for the same reason that this isnt.


“Nearly half of all the unauthorized migrants now living in the United States entered the country legally through a port of entry such as an airport or a border crossing point where they were subject to inspection by immigration officials, according to new estimates from the Pew Hispanic Center. As much as 45% of the total unauthorized migrant population entered the country with visas that allowed them to visit or reside in the U.S. for a limited amount of time. Known as ‘overstayers’, these migrants became part of the unauthorized population when they remained in the country after their visas had expired.”

President Trump can believe whatever he wants. But he can’t invent his own set of facts. A wall would only give a false sense of security. So Trump will build it, mainly, for political reasons.

Immigration is, in essence, an economic and social problem of supply and demand. If you really want to solve this dilemma, you have to start by legalizing the undocumented population already here and implementing a multi-national system to make legal immigration easier, not more difficult. Nothing else will work.

Trump’s wall is totally useless. Any smart person would know that.

Jorge Ramos: Donald Trump's Wall Is Totally Useless

ok lets go step by step here , you say 50% , the figure from the pew hispanic center is gospel , so i will run with that . that leaves 50% who can be stopped at the border with a wall . Israel has a wall and a huge portion of terrorist activity has stopped .

the next step is implement e verify , that keeps illegals from being hired which should dent the other problem, overstays

but my meme didnt address that . what it did address is the lie about asylum seekers the MSM keeps pushing and how horrible it is to separate kids from their parents with fake magazine covers and pictures from the OBAMA era . the fact is you can apply for asylum in any of those areas and not be separated from your kids

i am sorry but why are we funding drug cartels , and coyotes so the can traffic children ? where is that outrage ? . why are parents let off the hook for their law breaking ways ? . they use children , most of which we cant prove are theirs , as pawns to force their way here against our laws

never mind that bill clintons passed that law , and obama and bush enforced it , its all trumps fault with the Trump derangement syndrome crowd

we dont want open borders , and Mr ramos is a KNOWN open borders advocate who is a citizen of 2 countries , ours and mexico so pardon me if i question his data