- Thread starter
- #261
Sharkonabicycle
Bipedal Sea Dog
Told you guys we needed that TD. Had we punted this would've been a 2 point game.
Actually, he played a solid game Shark. Got a bullshit PI call when the receiver pushed off.More curious about the number of targets and receptions allowed. That's great you're tackling but if you're allowing catches that's a problem.
More curious about the number of targets and receptions allowed. That's great you're tackling but if you're allowing catches that's a problem.
Actually, he played a solid game Shark. Got a bullshit PI call when the receiver pushed off.
They didn't throw his way a lot with Woolen being out but when they did, his coverage looked pretty good. Granted, he got lucky a couple of times but he had good technique and was solid. Woolen being out hurt us a lot today. That side got burned often.I was watching the game from afar and chatting with friends so admittedly I couldn't watch it all with how I'd like to. That's great if he was playing really well! I mean hey, I'm rooting for the guy, he cost a lot in terms of draft capital and salary. Just saying tackles isn't really what I look for in gauging how someone played. Yah if you get 2-3 sacks or interceptions it's pretty damn obvious what that means. If you get a bunch of tackles was that because you allowed a reception or the play to happen? Dunno...
But I'll take your word for it man. I did see some of him at the bar and he did make some good plays from what I could see. Let's hope it keeps up!
They didn't throw his way a lot with Woolen being out but when they did, his coverage looked pretty good. Granted, he got lucky a couple of times but he had good technique and was solid. Woolen being out hurt us a lot today. That side got burned often.
Here are the Yards on every Witherspoon tackle.I was watching the game from afar and chatting with friends so admittedly I couldn't watch it all with how I'd like to. That's great if he was playing really well! I mean hey, I'm rooting for the guy, he cost a lot in terms of draft capital and salary. Just saying tackles isn't really what I look for in gauging how someone played. Yah if you get 2-3 sacks or interceptions it's pretty damn obvious what that means. If you get a bunch of tackles was that because you allowed a reception or the play to happen? Dunno...
But I'll take your word for it man. I did see some of him at the bar and he did make some good plays from what I could see. Let's hope it keeps up!
So who fucked up and gave up that long TD in the first half?
trading wilson away when they did is looking even more like the greatest trade of all time. the broncos are screwed for years to come.
C/ATT | YDS | AVG | TD | INT | SACKS | QBR | RTG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23/38 | 306 | 8.1 | 1 | 1 | 1-12 | 67.6 | 83.9 |
C/ATT | YDS | AVG | TD | INT | SACKS | QBR | RTG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23/36 | 296 | 8.2 | 1 | 1 | 2-17 | 60.8 | 87.3 |
C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS QBR RTG 23/38 306 8.1 1 1 1-12 67.6 83.9
C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT SACKS QBR RTG 23/36 296 8.2 1 1 2-17 60.8 87.3
I think these two QB's played almost like mirror images of each other don't you? Wilson wasn't the reason they lost and Geno wasn't the reason we won today. Neither one did much to help their teams win or lose.
When was the last time a NFL team scored 70 points in a game that's just disgusting. Did Miami just continue to run up the score or something? Or is Denver's Defense just THAT bad?