- Thread starter
- #1
Sir Robin Of Camelot
You seem angry. Miserable, even.
If it’s zero, give me the over.
What if it's 3?
If it’s zero, give me the over.
Your reasoning is one I can respect. It's a legit argument and I agree with it. Especially the one that has shown to have thus side effect.A bunch of Democratic Texas state legislators got Covid despite being fully vaccinated. Well, at least they tested positive, which is still what counts.
I don't think being a Conscientious Objector to these vaccines should put you at risk, but indemnify those who take the jab. They're still making this a political decision instead of a personal one.
As a cardiac patient on blood thinners to prevent clotting, I don't trust products that increase the risk of clots. That should be my choice, not the government's.
In this instance, for the NFL, it isn't a political or personal decision, it's a business decision. It's clearly in the NFL's best interests to have as many players as possible vaccinated. They are making policy decisions consistent with those interests.A bunch of Democratic Texas state legislators got Covid despite being fully vaccinated. Well, at least they tested positive, which is still what counts.
I don't think being a Conscientious Objector to these vaccines should put you at risk, but indemnify those who take the jab. They're still making this a political decision instead of a personal one.
As a cardiac patient on blood thinners to prevent clotting, I don't trust products that increase the risk of clots. That should be my choice, not the government's.
It is your choice, these guys can choose to find another profession. Simple.A bunch of Democratic Texas state legislators got Covid despite being fully vaccinated. Well, at least they tested positive, which is still what counts.
I don't think being a Conscientious Objector to these vaccines should put you at risk, but indemnify those who take the jab. They're still making this a political decision instead of a personal one.
As a cardiac patient on blood thinners to prevent clotting, I don't trust products that increase the risk of clots. That should be my choice, not the government's.
Oh they will object and maybe go to court by the time a court rules the season will Most likely be over.In a forfeit, neither team gets paid. I don't see how the NFLPA can not object.
Not being a smart ass but that’s not exactly confident at least not betting wise but then again I don’t bet but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last month.I would be confident betting on zero forfeits. At most, there will be 1 or 2.
The delta variant has been shown to be more infectious.What about outbreaks for teams fully vaccinated? The Delta variant is a different strain that the vaccinations weren't prepared for. As to the guys refusing the vax, I don't get that at all. I didn't feel I needed it and don't really believe in them but I still got the thing just to prevent travel hassles. But that's a whole different conversation.
As to the over/under, I doubt there will be any forfeits so over, I guess. Made it through last season, they will get through this one, methinks. Cheers fellas.
what taking one option and hedging it with two others isnt confidence?Not being a smart ass but that’s not exactly confident at least not betting wise but then again I don’t bet but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last month.
If the vaccine is a risk for you, that does not mean you can ignore policy aimed at protecting others.A bunch of Democratic Texas state legislators got Covid despite being fully vaccinated. Well, at least they tested positive, which is still what counts.
I don't think being a Conscientious Objector to these vaccines should put you at risk, but indemnify those who take the jab. They're still making this a political decision instead of a personal one.
As a cardiac patient on blood thinners to prevent clotting, I don't trust products that increase the risk of clots. That should be my choice, not the government's.
Right. How does the non offending team lose pay? Guilty by scheduling?In a forfeit, neither team gets paid. I don't see how the NFLPA can not object.