redseat
Well-Known Member
Too bad FIFA won't do a damn thing about the CLEAR bite from Suarez!
That's a bad angle of the penalty. This one is better. Clearly shows the defender run into Samaras's back leg while he was shooting. No attempt at the ball, good call.
[YOUTUBE]XnxO-rtj25E[/YOUTUBE]
Dude is going to the ground then grunts.. BS! and yes I have played soccer
Theres no doubt he sells the contact but make no mistake ... There IS contact that prevents a goal scoring chance in the box
So fucckin simple
That's a bad angle of the penalty. This one is better. Clearly shows the defender run into Samaras's back leg while he was shooting. No attempt at the ball, good call.
[YOUTUBE]XnxO-rtj25E[/YOUTUBE]
Still don't see how that's a PK at any point in the game, much less the final minute of injury time. The refs reserve only the obvious and egregious fouls for a penalty shot - I don't think this meets that standard. I think it's a bad call.
Then your take is even more shocking
If you call it there then you MUST call it about 20-30 times in a match and it is not... In order for it to be a penalty kick in that situation it must be a CLEAR cut penalty! That was not clear imo
Still don't see how that's a PK at any point in the game, much less the final minute of injury time. The refs reserve only the obvious and egregious fouls for a penalty shot - I don't think this meets that standard. I think it's a bad call.
Still don't see how that's a PK at any point in the game, much less the final minute of injury time. The refs reserve only the obvious and egregious fouls for a penalty shot - I don't think this meets that standard. I think it's a bad call.