- Thread starter
- #7,601
I know jack shit about Boeser but if that is the case and he has a good shot, that's not necessarily a terrible thing. Canucks just need a Backstrom.Went to my first game at The Ralph in UND and holy shit, if you are ever in the Upper Midwest for any reason make it a priority to check out a game there. I have no vesting interest in North Dakota hockey, but that arena is a fucking palace. The production and environment was better than I've ever witnessed at a hockey game. Literally the best place I've ever seen a sporting event at any level.
Tying it back to NHL talk..Sorry Nucks fans, but I've never understood the hype with Brock Boeser. The guy floats worse than Ovechkin. He basically set up a camp at the opponents blue line waiting for passes all night. Tyson Jost was much more impressive all night and he's only a freshman.
Trump deported all their fansWhat's the excuse going to be when they continue to bleed money?
http://SportsHoopla.com/ju3ur4a
This year's class was pretty weak but I don't see anyone other than Selanne that's a slam dunk on this list.
http://SportsHoopla.com/ju3ur4a
This year's class was pretty weak but I don't see anyone other than Selanne that's a slam dunk on this list.
http://SportsHoopla.com/ju3ur4a
This year's class was pretty weak but I don't see anyone other than Selanne that's a slam dunk on this list.
Curtis Joseph:
- Fourth all-time in saves with 2,427
- Fifth all-time in games played by a goaltender with 943
Agreed on everything but Andreychuk. I think he gets in eventually and I think this very well may be his year given the lackluster competition for a spot.Selanne is a lock. I'm betting this is the year that Recchi gets in.
After that it's a coin flip. My gut tells me Andreychuk will never get in. Cujo deserves it more than Osgood, IMO. Kariya probably just didn't play enough games to get in.
All great players but, as you said, no slam dunks.
That Aki Berg-Jyrki Lumme pairing made him look better than he was.Once again your link won't open for me so I assumed it was the Sportsnet list.
From that article
He must have played with GREAT defensive teams allowing less than 3 shots per game like that!!
I'm surprised, you're the second guy to advocate for Cujo on here. Any particular reason (feel free to answer this as well, @BGDave ) ?Agreed on everything but Andreychuk. I think he gets in eventually and I think this very well may be his year given the lackluster competition for a spot.
If they take three off that list - leaving room for an old-timer like Vachon - I'd say it's absolutely Selanne, then Andreychuk and Cujo, not necessarily in that order. Longevity was a big part of it for both of them, but the career numbers will just become too much to ignore at some point, especially for Cujo.
Like I said, mostly the cumulative effect of a long career. It may take a while, to the point that some of the people who actually remember his playing days aren't around anymore, but at some point they're going to see that the guy is 4th all time in wins (for now*) and he'll get credit for being able to play at a high level for an extended period of time.I'm surprised, you're the second guy to advocate for Cujo on here. Any particular reason (feel free to answer this as well, @BGDave ) ?
I suppose that's possible but other than 2 or 3 standout seasons he really wasn't anything spectacular. Other than his last couple of Oiler years he didn't play on teams that allowed an exorbitant number of shots.Like I said, mostly the cumulative effect of a long career. It may take a while, to the point that some of the people who actually remember his playing days aren't around anymore, but at some point they're going to see that the guy is 4th all time in wins (for now*) and he'll get credit for being able to play at a high level for an extended period of time.
At his peak he was never the best in the game, but he was a Vezina finalist 3 or 4 times I think and played in 3 or 4 all star games. Longevity and total career numbers can definitely be a factor for voting as time passes, especially in years with relatively weak classes.
Like I said, mostly the cumulative effect of a long career. It may take a while, to the point that some of the people who actually remember his playing days aren't around anymore, but at some point they're going to see that the guy is 4th all time in wins (for now*) and he'll get credit for being able to play at a high level for an extended period of time.
At his peak he was never the best in the game, but he was a Vezina finalist 3 or 4 times I think and played in 3 or 4 all star games. Longevity and total career numbers can definitely be a factor for voting as time passes, especially in years with relatively weak classes.