DragonfromTO
Well-Known Member
I'm not saying Kane won the Cup for his team. Not once did I even give that impression, other than showing he's won two Cups and been either the top or second-best scorer on his team in those runs. I said in the post you quoted "He and his team" or some form of that twice.
And yes, the Hawks have built a better team around their big two. Like I said, I only brought up the Conn Smythe because you brought up Bolland.
When I pointed out that Malkin was ahead of him in playoff points per game, an individual statistic, you posted "I know one category he's outscored him in" and a picture clearly defining that category as "stanley cup wins". How exactly was that supposed to be interpreted, if not as a statement of Kane's individual worth through team accomplishments?