- Thread starter
- #1
Tech_God
Well-Known Member
With the Rams moving to L.A.
Not true. With the Rams going it doesn't matter who goes now, divisions stay put. They didn't want two teams in the same division to share the stadium (Oak & SD). One less 10am game is right!
But if the bolts relocate then we move to the AFC????
I do feel for the St. Louis fans, hate that feeling.
I I still haven't watched an entire NBA game since the Sonics were stolen and won't until there's a team in Seattle called the Sonics wearing green and yellow. I wouldn't blame St. Louis fans if that's the option they went with here.
It's awful for the fans being left behind anytime a team relocates. I empathize with St. Louis football fans. They now face the same dilemma that Sonics fans faced. Do they continue to root for the Rams from afar, root for the nearby Chiefs or stop watching football altogether unless/until they can get a new team in St. Louis to root for? When the Sonics were stolen, I chose to keep an eye on the progress of getting a new team and pretty much stop watching NBA basketball in the meantime. I still haven't watched an entire NBA game since the Sonics were stolen and won't until there's a team in Seattle called the Sonics wearing green and yellow. I wouldn't blame St. Louis fans if that's the option they went with here.
Fuck the NBA. It is dead to me until a team is back in Seattle.
This one is a little hard to me, since the Rams fans I know personally are fans from the Los Angeles Rams days, and they are happy to have them back, and I'm happy for them. But, for the fans in St. Louis, this is the second time a team has been taken from them (the Cardinals in 1988).
Who knows, maybe Jacksonville decides to try St. Louis instead of London.....
Seeing another fanbase lose its team is what kept me from getting too excited at the prospect of the Sacramento Kings relocating to Seattle, as unlikely as the prospect of that happening was to begin with. That was, in my opinion, just the NBA using the threat of relocation to a city whose fans are still reeling from the loss of their own team to force Sacramento to pony up the dough for a new arena. They toyed with Kings fans and with Sonics fans with that situation and I didn't like it. Yes, it would have been great to have pro basketball back in Seattle and it will be when it happens, but I'd rather get an expansion team when it happens and not feel like I'm rooting for someone else's team.
What sucks is that relocation seems to be the preferred option over expansion of all these pro leagues in getting teams where they want to get them. I know the reasons why they prefer relocation over expansion (the two main reasons being that they want to avoid overexpansion, which makes sense, and they want to be able to have leverage over a city that they're trying to extort for a new building, which should be illegal) and I even understand one of them, but it sucks for the fans that lose their team because another city wants one and is willing to foot the bill to house one. Even in cities where the citizenry seems fairly uninterested in their own team (Jacksonville), relocating the team is going to devastate the fans that do care.