Yankee Traveler
Well-Known Member
Then we can talk draft
WR or Kicker?
Kicker or WR???
WR. No, Kicker. No, WR. No....
Then we can talk draft
Hell I was wrong about Folk dont care how old he is he's been very good. I don't know what to do about WRs, is it BB, Josh our WRs coach? There is a breakdown in selecting talent at that position and every time we draft a guy my stomach drops.WR or Kicker?
Kicker or WR???
WR. No, Kicker. No, WR. No....
Fix the O-line and we will have a good receiving corps.....Hell I was wrong about Folk dont care how old he is he's been very good. I don't know what to do about WRs, is it BB, Josh our WRs coach? There is a breakdown in selecting talent at that position and every time we draft a guy my stomach drops.
Ehhhhhhh not sure I agree.Fix the O-line and we will have a good receiving corps.....
It's a start.Fix the O-line and we will have a good receiving corps.....
I was being facetious.Hell I was wrong about Folk dont care how old he is he's been very good. I don't know what to do about WRs, is it BB, Josh our WRs coach? There is a breakdown in selecting talent at that position and every time we draft a guy my stomach drops.
Why did you go and ruin this for us? Now we can mess with you about Folk anymore.Hell I was wrong about Folk ...
Branch was a second rounder. Everything he did was expected (certainly the high end)...I was being facetious.
Not sure about who or how the WR's are picked.
BB has drafted some doozies early. Blistering speed, incredible physicality, off the charts athleticism.
And they accomplish nothing. But hen there is Branch, Edelman, Meyers and a slew more that were taken late or brought in as RFA...so go figure.
Kickers, I think, is a bigger lottery.
You can I mostly ignored in the past I can mostly ignore it in the future.Why did you go and ruin this for us? Now we can mess with you about Folk anymore.
That's part of the game!My one question/concern about this game (well besides Mills being god awful) is this...
"Did Mcdaniels really need to try all those trick plays against the Jets?" Now teams know what to expect
That's part of the game!
Give our next opponents something to worry about......
Yeah that was kind of a waste IMO. If this was his idea of opening up the playbook how did our rookie QB benefit from that? That was juvenile IMOMy one question/concern about this game (well besides Mills being god awful) is this...
"Did Mcdaniels really need to try all those trick plays against the Jets?" Now teams know what to expect
Yeah that was kind of a waste IMO. If this was his idea of opening up the playbook how did our rookie QB benefit from that? That was juvenile IMO
Yes, my point being great pick no matter the expectation, or bust.Branch was a second rounder. Everything he did was expected (certainly the high end)...
Exactly they could easily have tried some of the play Mac may be struggeling with in practice.The first one was great (because it worked) but to try it what 3 more times was a little dumb, especially since they were not needed at all since they were blowing out the Jets
Which is exactly why I was comfortable doing it... It seemed to entertain others while not really being at your expense...You can I mostly ignored in the past I can mostly ignore it in the future.
It's not about whether they worked or not, it's about dictating how the defense approaches every play. In this case the defense has to play a little looser to be sure the trick plays are diagnosed and stopped. That gives the running game a little more room near the LOS and more opportunity for holes to exist. I think we can all see the biggest issue for the Pats run game is not what happens once a RB finds a hole.I get trying to have the opponent think of other things but we showed them what we are going do so they might in fact be ready for them.. Heck.. If they didn't work against the Jets (with the exception of the first one) why would they work against the Chargers or anyone else?
It's not about whether they worked or not, it's about dictating how the defense approaches every play. In this case the defense has to play a little looser to be sure the trick plays are diagnosed and stopped. That gives the running game a little more room near the LOS and more opportunity for holes to exist. I think we can all see the biggest issue for the Pats run game is not what happens once a RB finds a hole.
Because the first one worked and was totally out of left field, the idea was to throw more at them. It does give other teams something that will require them to actually work on because no matter how the Pats line up, they could throw something weird at you. Given that and the fact that they've gone to the Wildcat several times and they have two WRs that can throw the ball, The defense has to hesitate for just a split second when Mac tosses a lateral or does a two hand drop. Against any aggressive defense, they can be ball busters.The first one was great (because it worked) but to try it what 3 more times was a little dumb, especially since they were not needed at all since they were blowing out the Jets