- Thread starter
- #1
This narrative has always been media and Kobe-hater created. The players cited in that Abbott hack job article are refuting Abbott's claims.
Only a loser wouldn't want to play with Kobe.
At this point, I think most of the Kobe hate is generated from the fact that it's been 19 years, and that many fans are simply tired of hearing about him. I tend to agree. I give him credit for being a 36-year-old guy to perform at the level he currently is, it's time for someone else to have the spotlight. A lot of it is by fault of the media, but Kobe's presence takes away from what the young stars of the NBA are trying to accomplish.
So, he's just supposed to retire even though he's still playing at a high level and is still better than 90% of the players in the league because some people are "tired of him"? Where was the Kareem hate when he played 20 years? Karl Malone played 19 and Tim Duncan is coming up on 20 himself. Where's the hate? It's pretty funny how people claim to be "tired of him", yet they can't stop from reading everything about him. Adrian Wojnarowski has said that all he has to do to get triple the clicks on any of his article's is to put Kobe in the title.
If I was an NBA player, I wouldn't want to play with a 36-year-old franchise player on his last legs. It's just business, that's all. I don't consider myself a loser for it. If you disagree, that's your opinion, and opinions can make assholes at times.
The people who've been pushing this notion are oddly quiet...
*guy LIKE that, not once does he use Kobes name until referencing that he would make players uncomfortable.
OK, so if these top players want to play with Kobe then why don't the Lakers of LA have a decent team?
Or is it that Kobe is sinking a good team with his shitty play and even worse teammate behavior?
Back on topic, if it isn't Kobe and the Lakers FO has said they are trying to compete for a title. Are they incompetent or lying?
*guy LIKE that, not once does he use Kobes name until referencing that he would make players uncomfortable.
OK, so if these top players want to play with Kobe then why don't the Lakers of LA have a decent team?
Or is it that Kobe is sinking a good team with his shitty play and even worse teammate behavior?
Back on topic, if it isn't Kobe and the Lakers FO has said they are trying to compete for a title. Are they incompetent or lying?
That would be pretty shortsighted. You'd be depriving yourself of the opportunity to learn from a guy with 5 rings and who is known for his tremendous work ethic and competitiveness. If you were a young NBA star with a lick of sense, it's a great situation. You get to learn from an all-time great for a season or 2 and then the Lakers become "your team."
I really can't believe I'm wasting my 1,000th career post on SportsHoopla on this, but here goes:
If I'm an NBA role player, say Jordan Hill, Khris Middleton, or Draymond Green (In Green's case a borderline Top 50 current NBA Player, I would consider going to L.A. for the money, which Hill did with solid individual results but little to elevate the team's play.
If I'm a borderline All-Star such as Rudy Gay who could have been a UFA at season's end, going to L.A. would make little sense because it's a decision between signing an extension with an organization with some young talent on its roster vs signing with a team that has 36-year-old Kobe Bryant and a bunch of uncertainty on the roster surrounding him. Sorry, but I'm taking my extension money with Sacramento.
If I'm a talented young point guard, say Brandon Knight or Eric Bledsoe, I would definitely make L.A. a top potential destination since they very much have an opening at such a hot NBA position (PG). The problem with that is that teams are using extensions and restricted free agency as leverage to lock up their point guards.
If I'm Carmelo Anthony, who was already made out as a coward for the way I left Denver, I'm not going to revisit that scenario again especially for the money New York is offering me. Plus, my kids are in school here and are quite comfortable with their surroundings. Still, if I'm a Laker fan I'm not so sure I wanted Carmelo anyway because all he's proven to be at this point is a stat-stuffer and first-round fixture.
All in all, I'm not quite sure what kind of "star" Laker fans think Kobe Bryant can attract.
As for what kind of "star" Kobe might attract. It's not about who he'd attract. It's the Lakers organization and Los Angeles itself, that is the attraction. Kobe just provides a superstar player who will retire within a a season or 2, but is still playing at a high level. As I said in the post that you quoted, it's an opportunity for a young star player to learn from an all-time great player for a season or 2 before being handed the keys. If you can't see what would be attractive about that situation, then I really don't how to help you.
One cash cow ain't going to get it done. You need other talented players in place to attract a legit, All-Star FA. Players today may be young but they're not that stupid. And now that Silver is pushing to no longer allow teenagers into the league anymore, the days of individual cash cows may start to become a thing of the past.
And to continue another one of your arguments: The reason fans didn't grow tired of Kareem during his final NBA season of 1988-89 is because Magic had taken the spotlight from him long before then. That, and the fact that Kareem wasn't a traveling soap opera like Kobe. You could argue that he didn't handle his departure from Milwaukee very well, but Kareem had the benefit of not having to put up with the stupidity of social media websites like Twitter (good for him), a site that tends make dumb human beings look dumber.
If KD really wanted to play with Kobe he could have not resigned with OKC and signed with the Lakers. Maybe KD really does want to play with Kobe and maybe KD is just talking out his ass.