- Thread starter
- #1
While I agree with the idea I'm so sick of the "the average career is 3.2 seasons" argument. That figure is skewed because of the huge number of players who sign for a month, a year etc. Guys who have proven they can play, like Alfred Morris, will play way more than 3 years.
God forbid Morris blows out his knee and cant take another snap. But you really think its even remotely fair to him to have made $250k morein three years total, than Ameer Abdullah got just for signing his name. And this is based mostly on the school they went to. Thats like saying a guy who graduated from Harvard with a 2.0 Should make 5 times as much as the Valedictorian from FSU. Teams constantly complain when they CHOOSE to over pay guys like Haynesworth. When a low rounder clearly outperforms his draft status, there should be measures in place to at least fairly compensate them for their effort.
God forbid Morris blows out his knee and cant take another snap. But you really think its even remotely fair to him to have made $250k morein three years total, than Ameer Abdullah got just for signing his name. And this is based mostly on the school they went to. Thats like saying a guy who graduated from Harvard with a 2.0 Should make 5 times as much as the Valedictorian from FSU. Teams constantly complain when they CHOOSE to over pay guys like Haynesworth. When a low rounder clearly outperforms his draft status, there should be measures in place to at least fairly compensate them for their effort.
Of course I don't think that's right which is what I said in my first sentence. My post had everything to do with the "average career" argument and nothing to do with what you are responding to.
OK gotcha.. but I will point out that that average career number also takes into account guys like Favre and D. Green who skew the metric the other way. Punters, Kickers and guys like Brian Mitchell and Bruce Smith that played until a week before they could draw SSI.