SteelersPride
Well-Known Member
Grape, has to be grapeDo you think it tastes like bubble gum? Minty? Cherry? Has to be something to keep on it that long
Grape, has to be grapeDo you think it tastes like bubble gum? Minty? Cherry? Has to be something to keep on it that long
Your thick aren't you? I didt read it, I don't care. Is that tough to understand?Translation = you can't refute anything that was in the article in question, so now you deflect.
Your thick aren't you? I didt read it, I don't care. Is that tough to understand?
Yes. Nothing at all.Why do you actually care what happened to his phone? It wasn't relevant to the case to begin with.
Yes. Nothing at all.
If you wanna play blind man, go walk with the shepherd.
ok lets do this. I agree brady 100% innocent. all facts you have stated are correct, i have be wrong about everything . Quote me on that.How was the phone relevant?
ok lets do this. I agree brady 100% innocent. all facts you have stated are correct, i have be wrong about everything . Quote me on that.
Now one question for me please?
Why are you on here daily arguing non-stop over the pats innocence? DAILY, all day!
What are you suggesting I'm ignorant about in this matter? The evidence is very clear that what is being suggested about them is baseless. Can you list any examples of actual cheating by them?
A lot of effort just prove nothing. Gold star for you, congrats.
Of course it's easy when the facts are on the side of Brady. Even the NFL isn't hiding from that point anymore.![]()
ok lets do this. I agree brady 100% innocent. all facts you have stated are correct, i have be wrong about everything . Quote me on that.
Now one question for me please?
Why are you on here daily arguing non-stop over the pats innocence? DAILY, all day!
THat's easy........he's Super Dooshing the NFL boards.
Do you believe the "deflator" references were due to weight loss? Seriously?
You seem to pick & choose what facts you wish to believe.
I've brought this up before, but what the heck, why not again. Again, the NFL isn't held to a court standard of evidence, unless collectively bargained. So let's use Richard Sherman's positive drug test.
Sherman is a stud, and a key component in Seattle's machine.
He's also most likely, guilty of failing a drug test.
That a collectively bargained technicality got him exonerated, doesn't change whether he's
A. Guilty
B. Innocent
But yeah, if not for that technicality, that the NFL HAD to abide by, he'd have gotten whacked. If the NFL could have, they WOULD have suspended him, and I'm sure a healthy % of Seahawks fans would have complained about witch-hunts and other unfairness.
But I wouldn't have been one of them.
YRMV.![]()
Answer the question. Why are you deflecting?"DAILY, all day"?
And for the time that I am actually on here, you can just ignore it, yet you don't.
Answer the question. Why are you deflecting?
ok well i asked , and yet you continue to not answer.........deflect away buddyI already have, not only on this thread, but numerous times over the years.