So because we're finally not picking top 10 we should be reckless with our pick?
Should we consider Tommy Streeter at 30, too?
Hill was being projected as a late first, early second round pick BEFORE the combine. I don't understand how taking him at 30 could be considered reckless; especially since he just validated himself with the fastest 40 time and outstanding size.
If we were talking about taking Hill in the top 10 then I could understand your point.
Streeter is a track guy, word was he was gonna run in 4.3's and he still wasn't being projected to go as high as 30. I don't see why he would now since nothing has changed.