- Thread starter
- #101
Jack_John_Mark
¿Cómo está usted?
Won't be butthurt at all if not sweater.
Well that's about the most suspect post ever made on this board. LMAO
Yeah. So why would Tressel sit for "the entire first year" if he only has to sit for 5 games?
And yeah it does seem unlikely. But unless Eichorst is a complete idiot he doesn't fire a perennial 9 win players coach without a slam dunk hire lined up.
I don't know anything about the show cause thing, but can that come with sanctions to the school outside of the coach being required to sit 5 games? Maybe we got that eliminated by saying he'll sit the year. I think that is highly unlikely and looks really sketchy but that was my thought when I first read it.
The coach having to sit the first 5 games and the bowl game is "the sanctions on the school".
Do you really think the guy who articulately gave his reasoning for letting Bo go today and hit a home run with every media question asked would get let the Nebraska program get into such a crazy scenario as was presented in that post?
He'd be committing AD suicide.
So yous guys are thinking its not tressel now?