I guess I’m most pissed at the guys that were already in when they pulled this shit, like Clemons and Bonds.
If memory serves, Bonds never tested positive.
I guess I’m most pissed at the guys that were already in when they pulled this shit, like Clemons and Bonds.
He admitted it, and you know, his head doubled in sizeIf memory serves, Bonds never tested positive.
It’s not a question of if, they better try. The combo of Michaels and Torico woukd bring some credibility back to ESPN.
He admitted it, and you know, his head doubled in size
No shit that’s stupidSuch a cry baby
the Saints are in some deep shitHappy trails, Mr Payton.
You turned around a bad franchise and led them to a ring.
Yeah, I guess Payton knew Winston wasn't the "answer."the Saints are in some deep shit
no QB
no coach
waaaaaaay over the cap
at least their division sucks balls- esp. if Brady retires.
Yeah, I guess Payton knew Winston wasn't the "answer."
LOL.
I'm not one to bash David Ortiz, but he had a positive steroid test back in the day and made it to the hall. With Bonds, it's just speculative given how much he blew up physically once he went to SF.So trash
Right, there is no reason to not put him in. Go ahead take away his records but put him in. He was a HOF'r player before he juiced up and literally everyone and their mom was juicing up at the time but they are putting these others juicers in the HOF. I don't get it.I'm not one to bash David Ortiz, but he had a positive steroid test back in the day and made it to the hall. With Bonds, it's just speculative given how much he blew up physically once he went to SF.
But Bonds is the best player I've ever seen in baseball. Steroids can only take you so far. Bonds was a pure talent and then some.
Clemens and Bonds not being in the hall soils it for the rest that are sitting in there right now.
Dude, I just don't understand the existing model for the HOF. Sports media has shown a bias over the years. I think it should be a model somewhat similar to the Heisman committee where existing members get a vote. It's asinine that the media gets to act as the gate keepers. I think a combination of existing members, coupled with the media should share votes.Right, there is no reason to not put him in. Go ahead take away his records but put him in. He was a HOF'r player before he juiced up and literally everyone and their mom was juicing up at the time but they are putting these others juicers in the HOF. I don't get it.
Well the HOF has been bogus for years so it really isn't a surprise for me, they obviously have an agenda. I mean there were players that were elected as 1st ballot guys that no businessDude, I just don't understand the existing model for the HOF. Sports media has shown a bias over the years. I think it should be a model somewhat similar to the Heisman committee where existing members get a vote. It's asinine that the media gets to act as the gate keepers. I think a combination of existing members, coupled with the media should share votes.