Happened all season.
It’s both. LA has a ton of people. It’s a rotten football town though.
I don’t assume it. I’ve watched it. Niners Eagles Steelers Browns all to varying degrees took over that stadium.
Yeah I wouldn't like that either.......even though it kind of helps us as makes an away game neutral site I'm hoping the Browns are not the team they choose for this game as I prefer Sunday games.
Or how about give the fans, many who have been paying for years, an extra home game? since all teams in conference get the extra home game the years they have them it's not like it's a competitive advantage.
I guess question is why does the schedule need to be balanced since it's not a competitive advantage when every team in the conference will have an extra home game (or 1 less).
OK, IF that's true I take back what I said. They should have theirs like nearly everyone else has.
I doubt it’s an AFC Central team. Like I said, the Eagles have real football fans. They’re not going to want a home game vs one of those teams to be taken away when they likely only come to town like once every 8 years with the scheduling cycle. Browns, Bengals, Steelers, and Ravens are real fanbases. Those teams deserve an opportunity to travel to an away stadium that’s rarely in the mix to see their team.
Exactly! It’s a garbage franchise in a Floribama. College sports is king down there. They have zero fucks to give about the NFL down there.
Compelling argument from the <checks notes> Seahawks fan that lives in the Los Angeles area.lol
The reason why they would rather expand their international audience than give fans another home game is pretty obvious
JVille has gone to England so much because the owner is from there. I highly doubt it is JVille who has gone out of their way to foment a fan base in England and will likely go there again.
How so if every team in the conference either has 9 home or 9 road games (which is how it works)?
