Heatles84
Well-Known Member
I'm not convinced the Warriors have passed their toughest test.
First of all, if the Thunder had won the series, the Cavs would have been favored so most people thought the Cavs were the better team.
Secondly, the Cavs will be a much better team down the stretch than OKC. OKC's biggest problem was that they couldn't hold on to a lead. Yes, GS is the most incredible shooting team in history, but if OKC had simply had slightly fewer turnovers or missed shots, they would have been able to withstand the GS 3-point barrage.
Thirdly, I doubt the Cavs will allow the Warriors to score so many points. In 4 of the Western Conference Final games, the winning team scored 118 or more points. Even if you don't think Cleveland's defense is better than OKCs, the Cavs will do a MUCH better job of controlling the tempo. In OKC, both Westbrook and Durant tended to put up quick shots, so there were more possessions.
OKC also matched up better with the Warriors then the Cavs do against the Warriors. Just like Cleveland preferred to face OKC then the Warriors because of match ups.
You could say that Cleveland will control the tempo, but they're going to try to play the Warriors game based on their offense in the playoffs - this means a lot of 3's which means a lot of fast transitions off of misses, which falls into the Dubs category. OKC had length that bothered the Warriors and capable bigs in Adams and Ibaka that could defend and poise problems for the Warriors. Love and Thompson aren't doing that for the Cavs.
You can say that the Cavs won't allow the Warriors to score many points. But the Warriors excel at the pick and roll, while the 2/5 of the Cavs starting roster are highly suspect in defending the pick and roll.
Cavs aren't head and shoulders better than the Thunder, or vice versa. Cleveland will present their own challenges to the Warriors. But to assume that the Warriors won't have a say in how they dictate the game is asinine.