- Thread starter
- #101
vancelot23
Active Member
BJGE has never fumbled the ball...period. Recovered by his own team or another. He hasn't put it on the ground.
Except one is a proven receiver out of the backfield.
Except one is a proven receiver out of the backfield.
So if we had signed anyone of merit, and they are average players, but have WAY BEYOND average contracts, now we are stuck with them for a while and can't make other moves to save guys we want to sign.
AJ Green is going to get 80+ million dollars when he resigns.
Dalton is going to get 60+ million.
Atkins is going to get 50+ million.
Those are some big ass contracts upcoming in a couple years, and next year we have to be at 99% cap spending, so contracts have to be structured properly to make sure these three guys get paid, while accounting for having to spend right up to the cap basically. There will be next to no wiggle room, guys will have to be dropped to allow for these contracts, and if you want to make sure you sign your stars, you have to move around a bit like this.
FILLER, not big ass stars. You sign a mega contract in FA when you need ONE DAMN PLAYER to get you ready for a big run. You do not sign mega contracts if you need a ton of roster spots filled. Not replaced, but filled. We have a ton of free agents this year.
Dalton, Green, and Atkins aren't keeping us from signing a WR like Eddie Royal or Josh Morgan who could be had cheaply, are versatile (as Royal can return) and are definite upgrades to what we have now.
The 'we will spend money in the future' argument is bullshit because of this, and the fact that knowing MB's track record, how sure are we that we'll even end up resigning these guys? JJ was our best player on D, we had the money, and still let him walk.
This is a fallacy as pointed out many times. We offered JJ as good a deal as Houston. He wanted a chance to win and left anyway.
Dalton, Green, and Atkins aren't keeping us from signing a WR like Eddie Royal or Josh Morgan who could be had cheaply, are versatile (as Royal can return) and are definite upgrades to what we have now.
The 'we will spend money in the future' argument is bullshit because of this, and the fact that knowing MB's track record, how sure are we that we'll even end up resigning these guys? JJ was our best player on D, we had the money, and still let him walk.
It's not a fallacy. We all know the bengals don't get players because they don't offer enough. We have all stated this plenty of times before that we have to offer more than other teams for the reason that a)we suck and b) our ownership sucks. Money talks. If the money was there, he would be a Bengal.
It is not bullshit, because you have to align the contracts you want gone with the time in which you need the money for your stars, because when you are goign to be forced to spend 99% of teh cap, you are goign to have zero wiggle room to all of a sudden add 200 million in salary to your payroll for 3 guys.
We offered the same contract, with a million less in guaranteed money, but the same overall. He chose Houston. Mike Brown is not going to spend more money than any other team just because we do not have a great reputation. That is a fault of Mike Brown, it makes him cheap yes, but you hardly ever find Mike Brown sign a contract that comes back to saddle the team financially.
What is going to happen when some other team offers AJ the same contract with more guaranteed money? You think he will magically stay with the bengals, too?
The only way the stigma of the cheap, shit bengals is going to change, is if Mikey opens the purse a little bit and incites guys to stay. JJ was the perfect opportunity to do so.
This has been an issue for a long time with the bengals in FA. How do you propose we fix it other than showing guys the bengals really want them aside from money? Baking a cake isn't going to do it.
You're overstating this so badly it's comical.
This is a fallacy as pointed out many times. We offered JJ as good a deal as Houston. He wanted a chance to win and left anyway.