mattola
Scotchy Scotch Scotch!
Are you serious on that comment about the hit Johnny? I need to be 100% clear
Are you serious on that comment about the hit Johnny? I need to be 100% clear
Good luck coming into MSG in an elimination game and coming out on top. This series is over on Thursday. Habs will be lucky to get 1 past Hank tomorrow night. Let the Habs players keep talking, once again, you trail 3-2 in the series. One bad game from Hank doesn't mean shit.
My question is simple
Do you think moores but was as dirty as prusts
Yes or no?
As Therrien said ''It's a hockey hit'' i'll leave it at that
Forget Barry Goldberg I think Jon Snow is a better name
Better watch what you wish for. Remember when the Rangers were down 3-1 to the Pens you wished that they would just end the embarrassment and then the Rangers came back. Now you are up 3-2 and stating it is over on Thursday you might have jinxed it.
Forget Barry Goldberg I think Jon Snow is a better name
JohnLuTSNMtl: #Habs Therrien says Prust will play in Game 6, whether or not Dorsett is in the #NYR lineup.
New York radio people, for you
BTW as for the Moore hit - I don't care what anyone thinks of it , that hit was long overdue and Moore got the right guy. If Habs fans have a problem with it too damn bad. When Prust did that to Stepan he should have been dismembered w/in 5 seconds but the Rangers let it go. Dorsett's attempt was honorable but worthless. Payback boys simple as that. Don't like it then don't ask for it. I personally enjoyed watching Weise searching for his head while being helped off the ice. Fuck'em
So now all NY'ers are morons? :rollseyes:
Despite his musical vow to never surrender, Corey Hart is indeed relenting. And it’s the Canadiens who are forcing him to stand aside.
The Montreal native, best-known for 1980s’ hits such as “Sunglasses at Night” and “Never Surrender” had a gala farewell concert scheduled for the Bell Centre this Saturday, his proclaimed last stadium show ever on his 52nd birthday.
But the possibility the Habs will need the arena if they force a Game 7 in the Eastern Conference final, has prompted the performer to reluctantly re-book. The new show will be played June 3.
You didn't need to include the word "radio" there.
This is the part I don't get. So, essentially you are saying you liked the hit because it was retaliatory which then makes it pre-meditated. And you still have a hard time coming up with what the difference is between the hits.
The hockey world generally agrees that if the puck was still on Stepan's stick, the Prust hit isn't even a penalty, the kind of hit Scott Stevens made a career out of. But the puck was long gone. So it was late and reckless. Unnecessary. And by definition, dangerous. Earned suspension.
Even if Weise still had the puck, Moore took several steps and hit a guy from behind/the side and went straight at the head. Even if Weise still had the puck, it's a dangerous hit. And there is no question by the replays that Moore intended to hit to hurt. Saying it was "retribution" makes it worse. In the heat of the moment, it's a stupid play. If the player sat there planning it, or worse yet was *told* to go do it...
Which is what it sounds to me like you are condoning. Pre-meditated attack.
And then you go absolutely apeshit when someone points out the coincidence of people landing on top of opponent goalies, particularly ones playing well.
The Rangers are righteous and would never do something of the sort. But every other team in the league resorts to these tactics and the Righteous Rangers are justified in fighting back. That about sum it up? :rollseyes:
I just threw that in just so you could focus on it and ignore the rest of what I said.
You're welcome.